K3llyR99

October 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mohammed VI of Morocco, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Before removing things you don't know why don't you ask? The source is official and the announcement too. On 2017 it was published and on 2018 the lawyer confirmed the information on TV. I'm really upset you deleted it because i worked hard on it. K3llyR99 (talk) 11:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Btw, i have noticed a user deleting many informations about middle eastern Royals I want to block him but how? so please delete his account or block is IP he's so disturbing!!! We work hard to add true informations we got from laywers and royal families and this spam user " EGEYM" comes and ruin everything. You can check his page and see all the spams he adds!!!

• EGEYMI (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). K3llyR99 (talk) 12:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello K3llyR99. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mohammed VI of Morocco, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:K3llyR99. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=K3llyR99|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. OhKayeSierra (talk) 05:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)