AfD Nomination: Wedge flipper

edit

An editor has nominated the article Wedge flipper for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wedge flipper. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Wedge flipper during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

February 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pope Benedict XVI, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Marauder40 (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pope Benedict XVI. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Attacks in the article File:Papaltine.jpg

edit
 

Please do not create attack pages as you did at File:Papaltine.jpg. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Going through your recent edits

edit

I've noticed that since last week, you've been engaged in nothing but outright bad edits (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Wikipedia is not for dicking around, consider yourself warned. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply