Speedy deletion of Vivaty

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Vivaty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Non-dropframe (talk) 22:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat

edit

Hello, Justinforasec, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat whether the article Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! LivitEh?/What? 16:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply