March 2013 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Harrias talk 22:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Societal impact edit

Just a note to say that I think that the Cricket in the West Indies article is coming along very nicely. What you are studying there is something of a love of mine, so I'm delighted to see it being looked at. I've left some suggestions on the talk page of the article. Are you aware as well that there are many pages on the history of West Indies cricket which might fall within the scope of what you are trying to do? Very few of them are well developed, so you would almost have a free hand in working on them. Keep up the good work, and let me know if I can help further. I'm afraid I'm a cricket obsessive, so I can probably point you to further sources. (I don't know if you have ever seen a cricket match, but you should have a look on Youtube to see what all this is about. I would recommend searching for Garry Sobers, Viv Richards, Gordon Greenidge, Michael Holding or Curtly Ambrose to see what all the fuss is about with West Indies cricketers) Sarastro1 (talk) 20:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply