Jphogan

File copyright problem with File:AMM&JPH'71.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:AMM&JPH'71.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 18:04, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

>>> from user JPHOGAN I own this photo and have all rights needed for its posting here. I will though check its page to see if someone has deleted or altered that part of information.

There are still problems with this image. Actually did you take this photo when you were 6 years old? That's what the image information tells us. When you say you have all the rights, do you realise that possession does not confer any right on you unless the photographer has given his rights away. Who took this photo and what is the source? If you claim it to be a historic image, as you do, you must use it with a fair-use claim which implies that you do not have the rights to it. Maybe we can clarify this. I am watching this page for a while so there is no need to post on my talk page. Thanks. Please sign your posts by adding four tildes like this ~~~~ ww2censor (talk) 20:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

>>> I am just checking back after a while here. See article is no longer much like it's original copy and have yet to discover "why" or "whom". The picture though is a family photo I cropped to just be as uploaded taken by my father. Wiki options for photo labeling probably still confuse me, I will try to find time to consider again.

Arthur M. Menadier

I'm sorry, but I've nominated the above article for deletion. I don't think it satisifes wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. You can find the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur M. Menadier, and you are most welcome to participate. My apologies, and please have a nice day, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 16:12, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

>>> From user JPHOGAN, this article should not be deleted. It is in its early stages with extended family hardly aware yet of geneology and business legacy as towards notability. Yes I mention myself but more towards carrying the issue while rest of family and friends have chance to contribute and confirm. I wouldn't be me in spirit with the moment of his expression in the attached photo but that is a story for another page.

I am in the process also of trying to find former co-workers through a Y&R newsletter.

Consider there wouldn't have been a Mad Man tv show without his part in my life and my sharing such with a friend recently married into the Cablevision family, and that after ninety days I haven't found more people willing to "establish" his notability a deletion would seem warranted. He did have three Menadier relatives that came over and fought in our Civil War, and survived in holding of J&J account altitude for twenty five years. This Wikipedia is new to me and its editing and "community". One of his grandchildren now a President of Media Sales and a VP of Time Warner Cable too, and another a past champion kick-boxing fighter at notable levels and he an adopted into a family related to Gov. Griswold of CT, and with such "cousin" "black" and in inspiration (long story through me again) of "Different Strokes" show.

The nature of "fame" in that profession? His "notability" in near every print ad, radio spot, tv ad and commercial product placement for 25 years if I recall correctly with the entirety of J&J's advertising and marketing needs leaves alot of "pieces" out there in "culture" that A.M.M.'s finger prints and spirit all over. An inspiration to all future marketers?

Look, you have to remember, the article isn't about his relatives. So don't use that as a reason. And hundreds of people fought in the civil war, they don't all have articles. I'm not sure what the rest of it is you're on about, sorry. His part in J&J stuff, yes, that can make him notable. But we NEED sources that appear in reliable third-party publications. I've replied a bit more on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur M. Menadier page. And I'm really sorry, but I honestly don't know what the Mad Man Tv show is. His influence in that doesn;t really make him notable either, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:48, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:AMM&JPH'71.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AMM&JPH'71.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

You changed the copyright to indicate this as a fair-use historic image but still claim to have taken the photo yourself. Which is it? It cannot be both. Please fix this image problem. Perhaps reading my image copyright information page will help you, otherwise drop me a post. ww2censor (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JPETERHOGANpx.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JPETERHOGANpx.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 05:58, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Arthur M. Menadier. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 12:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Arthur M. Menadier. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Mild Bill Hiccup (talk) 12:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

>>>> From J P Hogan > What exactly are you objecting to of Arthur M. Menadier's history as a creative professional in the way it was linked and told? It wasn't to "soapbox" but brevity and thoroughness.  ???

Nomination of Arthur M. Menadier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arthur M. Menadier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur M. Menadier (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StarM 21:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)