User talk:Josh Tumath/monobook.js

Edit request on 30 October 2012

edit

- please fix the double redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 03:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC).Reply

Redirects don't work with .js and .css pages; would it be better to delete it instead as {{db-nouser}}? --Redrose64 (talk) 09:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Probably. I notice that there are a number of links but I suspect it doesn't matter too much which. A redirect will act as a soft redirect. Rich Farmbrough, 12:38, 31 October 2012 (UTC).Reply
I've checked several of those links - all of the ones that I checked are only linked to User:Titan602/monobook.js because that page is linked from User:AnomieBOT/PERTable‎ which is transcluded onto those user pages, either directly or via the {{Admin dashboard}}. To test this theory, I'm setting |ans=yes above; if I'm correct, the WhatLinksHere should drop to a very small number, possibly zero, when the job queue has finished. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Just as I thought:
Pages that link to "User:Titan602/monobook.js"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
← User:Titan602/monobook.js
Jump to: navigation, search
What links here Page:  Namespace: 
Filters Hide transclusions | Hide links | Hide redirects

No pages link to User:Titan602/monobook.js
Thus, I've zapped the page under WP:CSD#U2. Regarding User:Mephiles602/monobook.js which is also a redirect, this is presently exempt from U2, because it's a recently-renamed user. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nice, that only leaves AMLATHEAS pages and the canonical example pages. Rich Farmbrough, 03:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC).Reply
Er, which are those, specifically? --Redrose64 (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
and
Really only the second one should be needed, but AMALTHEA has used the first in a bugzilla.
Rich Farmbrough, 17:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC).Reply
Ah, so you're saying to leave these two instances alone, yes? --Redrose64 (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes, unless you want to ask/suggest to AMALTHEA that those ones can go? Rich Farmbrough, 19:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC).Reply
Not really; I'm happy to leave those, since they apparently have a purpose. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:36, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply