User talk:Joojay/Archives/2021/April

Fawn Weaver reverts

Hello - I came across Fawn Weaver in the news, and noticed her page needed some serious updating. After making a couple formatting edits, I looked in the history and noticed you had reverted a rather large edit on 3/5, marking it as COI. While that does seem obvious based on previous, similar edits, some of the information does need to be updated - and quite frankly, reverting her current position as a CEO to focus on her as a "relationship blogger" feels demeaning, and borderline sexist (which surprised me - it seems you're pretty involved with WP:WOMEN).

The sources used by the COI IP were valid ones that meet WP:SIGCOV, and I think most of the neutral information should be reinstated (another example: most writers with books listed on NYT Bestsellers are allowed to mention it in their opening paragraphs - why is Fawn not?). I would love to hear your thoughts, so this page can be properly updated. Thank you! AICross97 (talk) 16:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

@AICross97: hello, you can see in the edit history for 3/5 some of the sources are self published (ie. the Uncle Nearest website, WP:BLPSPS) and the Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey and Nathan "Nearest" Green articles also have a COI history too (with many of the same users). The language fluffing was specifically an issue because this article has a history of COI edits and this was from an IP address, these edits it looked like similar edits from one of the COI edit accounts. If you feel strongly that the "NYT Bestsellers" should to be there or somethings should be added back, please do feel free to go ahead with those edits. Sorry for any confusion. Jooojay (talk) 18:07, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your response! I agree - some of the material was COI, but there's still good information from that reverted edit that is accurate and sourced from third parties (and I've been reviewing the existing sources on the page, and for example, the information about her being a relationship blogger is incorrect, sourced to an article that she neither wrote or participated in, someone just mentioned her book). I'm going to fix her intro to accurately reflect her current position, and will continue to review the existing sources and any additional sourcing we can use to improve the page. If there are any issues with the edits I make today or in the future, please let me know! Appreciate your help; thank you for all the hard work you do! AICross97 (talk) 18:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Creative Growth Art Center

Hello, Jooojay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Creative Growth Art Center, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Martha Nessler Hayden

I would like to talk with you, Jooojay, about the page for Martha Nessler Hayden. Thanks. MaryKLynch (talk) 02:59, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

@MaryKLynch: feel free to leave a message here. Jooojay (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)