Welcome

edit
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jessy T/C 00:57, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

ICT

edit

Please stop adding redlinked entries to the page ICT. The page is a disambiguation page, which is a navigational aid to assist users in locating the appropriate existing Wikipedia article. It should not contain red links to non-existing articles. Disambiguation pages are different than ordinary articles (in articles, red links can be appropriate, depending upon context). Thank you. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 21:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Institute for Career Transitions

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Institute for Career Transitions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tal Brenev (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute for Career Transitions (January 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Institute for Career Transitions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... It's a non-profit organization - it's NOT SELLING ANYTHING. We're TRYING TO HELP LONG-TERM UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE! I have removed everything but the mission statement, the link to the website, the link to the advisory board. and the citations (from reputable organizations! Hope that meets your "encyclopedic" requirements.--JobSearchPro (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • I respect your objective but it doesn't matter if you're selling anything or not. The article (and your username, for that matter) was a violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a forum for anyone to pitch their products, nonprofit or for profit; hence, the article deletion. sixtynine • spill it • 02:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 04:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unblock: You have blocked me for being too promotional

edit

FACT: I've been banned indefinitely for trying to create a Wikipedia page for a new (established in 2013) registered non-profit organization that provides FREE help to the long term unemployed - "because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes".

Perhaps the first version I submitted was too promotional! Maybe I did get carried away with my enthusiasm there. But, the last version was strictly the facts, only about 4 lines long, including a link to the organization's home page, plus links to the board of advisors (which I am on), and the media support the organization has already received ("citations"?).

Yet, I see Wikipedia pages for these non-profits:

And, of course, these 100% commercial organizations:

And undoubtedly millions more!

On that page, I included several very respected media links (NPR.org, MIT.edu, Harvard Business Review, Bloomberg.com) in the post.

Perhaps the post was too enthusiastic. I'll plead guilty to that. But, do you understand that MILLIONS of people have been unemployed for more than 6 months and we are trying to reach them and HELP THEM - *** FOR FREE ***

Do you know what happens to people who have been unemployed for more than a few months? This is what happens to long-term unemployed:

  • They lose their homes.
  • They commit crimes,
  • They commit suicide.
  • Many also wipe out their families when they have no hope.
  • The world's economy suffers.

I'll let you do the research on the impact of long-term unemployment, since you obviously wouldn't trust my research. But look into it, just a teensy bit, and TRY to forgive me for being so enthusiastic about an organization that's trying to PREVENT all of that tragedy.

My bottom line is that I'm astonished at this experience. Banned from Wikipedia for life for the inexcusable act of trying to create a page for a non-profit organization that is trying to help people who need help. Seriously?

PERHAPS, we have all over-reacted a bit? Maybe my format wasn't perfect and my first attempt at content was too enthusiastic, but, seriously, banned indefinitely?

Uphold this ban, and I'm never "darkening your door" again. I promise! This has been a very unpleasant and, frankly, disillusioning experience.

JobSearchPro (talk) 20:22, 31 January 2014 (UTC) JobSearchPro (sorry if you don't like the name, it's what I am)Reply