Jewjoo

Welcome to Wikipedia

Getting Started on

Please, click around! These easily navigable links should be indepesensable to the new user.   How to edit a page   Tutorial   Sandbox, the place where you can experiment   Where to ask a question.   What this site is based on   Manual of Style   What Wikipedia is not

Here are some ways you can help improve Wikipedia:   Create an article   Help remove vandalism   Translate an article   Improve illustrations and upload new images   Perform maintenance tasks   Become a member of a project that interests you   Contribute mottos to Motto of the Day

  Buster Seven Talk 22:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

You were correct on "Mnookin" source, you know

It may be bitter-sweet, considering what they put below here on your page without proper research or discussion on the other talk page, but if nothing else you were correct on the references text you claimed was in the Australian version of Mnookin book. One who against you has now reverted position and now says "this was just validated as properly sourced content, plesae see talk page" and changed back edits [1]. I doubt you will get an apology or retraction. Gongwool (talk) 23:51, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

yea ok. he applied to have me banned then he later admitted he was so wrong. lol. he only discusses on talk page afterward all his kaos, and I saw that load of rubbish he put about you on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Australian_Vaccination-Skeptics_Network ... he threatened me with WP-AIV if I did anymore edit. just bullying I guess. he only put all the stuff here down the page cause he was wrong nd was trying to turn people against me. I want to delete his wrong crap here on my talkpage, and keep on fixing the citations I was workin on before Jewjoo (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

I once was right about a reference

deleted stuff here that was due to an overzealous editor who tried to prove my cite didn't exist, when that wasn't the case. I lost my cool with this and was punished for such. other editor was not reprimanded for being dumb or belligerent, but just exited quickly with tail between their legs after I was suspended for 24 hrs.

I once held an opinion

dear god. deleted stuff here from editor cause they said "I've brought you into the conflict" at "ani" because I once did something or other that was fine at the time. not falling for that trick, so deleted.

I was once criticised for correctly fixing citations

pfft, some person not involved with the article i was working on got so wound up that I was reformatting citations in the standard wikipedia format, that they felt the need to critisise me here. they would have preferred me to do it their special way, why i dont know.

June 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jewjoo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HCCC NSW - PUBLIC WARNING AVN 2010.png

A tag has been placed on File:HCCC NSW - PUBLIC WARNING AVN 2010.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 19 May 2005, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)