Jewishnsbmfan

Message To Myself

I'm leaving myself this message so that in the future I will know how awesome I was. Jewishnsbmfan (talk) 03:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstars

Hi. I noticed that you put some barnstars on your talk page. The whole idea behind barnstars is for other users to give them to you, not to award them to yourself. The only barnstars that you are supposed to give yourself are the ones at Wikipedia:Service awards. Just letting you know, thank you. Asarelah (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

• Thank you, I am aware of the normal use of barnstars. I awarded myself these awards because I deserve them. Jewishnsbmfan (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Your account seems to be an obvious sock of Jewishfanofnsblackmetal (talk · contribs), based upon the username and your edits at Blood libel against Jews that are identical to that of the indef. blocked user. Jewishfanofnsblackmetal's last edit was at 03:03, 20 March 2008 before block; yours was only a few minutes later at 03:12, 20 March 2008. seicer | talk | contribs 00:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Why "false accusations" remains NPOV

The word "libel" is defined as a false accusation. Hence, the sentence "Blood libels are false accusations" is not POV, it is merely definition. --Rpresser 03:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Recent reverts

Some of your recent reverts ([1][2][3]) seem a bit strange... Could you explain, please? Thanks, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 20:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Reverting obvious vandalism. Jewishnsbmfan (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure I understand ... This edit adds a legitimate TfD nomination and these two edits convert bare links into ones with titles. How are they vandalism? Black Falcon ^(Talk) 15:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Please keep up the good work. If your quality posting continues, you will be praised by Wikipedia. LittleOldMe (talk) 12:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Santa Claus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Santa Claus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

And using an image clearly not that of the subject matter makes it unacceptable for use in the Santa Claus article. If you honestly feel that this has a place there, please engage your fellow editors on the article discussion page. Otherwise, your actions could be seen as disruptive. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 16:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Non-profit organization, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Non-profit organization was changed by Jewishnsbmfan (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-07-09T13:52:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Encyclopaedia Metallum. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 13:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Encyclopaedia Metallum. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 23:22, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Encyclopaedia Metallum. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 03:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

July 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for block evasion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:32, 15 July 2009 (UTC)