Welcome!

Hello, Jeffconn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy renaming of Washington Metro Stations in Washington, D.C. edit

Just to let you know, I've nominated Category:Washington Metro Stations in Washington, D.C. for a speedy renaming. I've done this in order to bring it in line with naming conventions. The capital "S" in "Stations" is against naming conventions (see WP:NC for a full description of Wikipedia's naming conventions), and the speedy rename will fix it. Don't worry - mistakes happen, and after the rename occurs in 48 hours, a bot will fix the links. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

VA baseball teams edit

The "Baseball teams in Virginia" category is only for professional teams, not semi or amateur teams. Please refrain from adding it to the amateur teams. JaMikePA (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The category was created by me for existing pro teams only. Perhaps when I have more time, I will change the name to Pro Teams in (state).JaMikePA (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

December 2008 edit

  Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Skyline Drive, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. (not trying to template a regular- but adding information with the minor tag isn't a good idea) tedder (talk) 04:37, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Moving a link at Hughes River edit

What was that all about? I think your change left the page a little messy. Can you give me a reason why to not make it look neater by putting it back the way it was? Thanks WVhybrid (talk) 01:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:HRflag.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HRflag.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Everglades Radio Network concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Everglades Radio Network, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 12:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Everglades Radio Network edit

 

Hello Jeffconn. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Everglades Radio Network.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Everglades Radio Network}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of newspapers in Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Comercio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inside Business (newspaper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 12 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of weekly newspapers in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Comercio. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit on Naval Auxiliary Landing Field Fentress today edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Wuerzele (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re. Martinsville Bulletin edit

Given that you're creating a new article (so there is no issue with attributing old revisions) and the existing article is just a redirect (and doesn't seem to have been deleted previously), you can simply go ahead and overwrite the redirect with your new article. However, please make sure the subject matter is sufficiently notable before creating the article. Thanks. wctaiwan (talk) 04:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia won't let me create the article because of the redirect.JeffConn (talk) 04:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I see. Yes, you were probably right to use the requested moves process given the circumstances. Since the request didn't show up properly, I thought you were creating a brand new article. I've asked an administrator to move the draft for you. wctaiwan (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup edit

 
Hello, Jeffconn. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 18:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Jeffconn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Towns in Virginia edit

That template is meant for limited cases where we're not supposed to split out the contents, e.g. "Women politicians" sometimes aren't supposed to be split out from politicians. The template was added by a single user, acting without consensus and without regard for our standards; it is not enforceable, and as you can see from the first paragraph in the fourth page of LC's intro] to LCSH, putting the same item in multiple levels of the same tree within a single thesaurus is deprecated. Any guide to classification will tell you that this in unhelpful; please don't persist in disrupting 90 pages with inappropriate categories. Nyttend (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Once again, the template was added by an isolated editor, without consensus for the action; in contrast to your claim that it's always been there, this category was in existence for more than nine years before it got added. Moreover, it's incompatible with the WP:DUPCAT policy on this subject — "all included" categories are meant for when a subgroup has "some special characteristic of interest" (of course this applies when two or more such subgroups exist), and merely subdividing the entire group geographically is not at all the same. Consider a by-state subdivision: would it be appropriate to include this template on Category:Towns in the United States and include all towns in all forty states (not fifty, since ten states don't have towns) in the category, as well as including them in the subcategories? This is the same situation. Nyttend (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Jeffconn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Towns in Virginia (reduxe) edit

Once again, please stop adding this category; I've removed the tag from the "Towns in Virginia" cat. Pinging @Nyttend:. Graham87 15:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Jeffconn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply