User talk:JarrahTree/Archive 44


Wikidata weekly summary #199 edit

The Signpost: 02 March 2016 edit

This Month in GLAM: February 2016 edit





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 09 March 2016 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #200 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Confused edit

Hi! Can you help me understand which ones were reverted and why? If you want to gather honey, don't kick over the beehive - Dale Carnegie 14:02, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


Jarrah, I'd like to solve this peacefully with you, and to also hear what it is you want to say. I've tried to do this by giving you my contact info so that a resolution could happen easier. So now I am offering for the second time in good faith, let's resolve this. I would like the User Space Harassment, and Wikihounding to stop. I have made factual academic mainstream assertions about the Historical Life of Muhammad which seem to have upset you? That said some of your statements were hurtful, and in violation of Wikipedia Harassment and I'd like for this to serve as a warning, but much more importantly an opportunity to resolve our dispute together! Jarrah: "you are close to WP:SOAPBOX and WP:SPA if you insist on your version of historical interpretation of islam. You are really heading towards being chastised further if you are keen on your mission. cheers. JarrahTree 00:01, 17 March 2016 (UTC):" - Telling others that if they do not adopt your historical perception and 'if you insist on your version of historical interpretation of Islam. You are really heading towards being chastised further if you are keen on your mission.' is not an appropriate thing to say, because it creates an environment in which editors feel unsafe to document historical facts even with evidence, and it also means that others will apply different standards for reverting based on the preferable viewpoint expressed in that particular wiki. You have sent me some great Wikipedia pages to review, and I've enjoyed doing that, so thanks. Here is a review of how Wikipedia defines Harassment. "Usually (but not always) the purpose is to make the target feel threatened or intimidated, and the outcome may be to make editing Wikipedia unpleasant for the target, to undermine, frighten, or discourage them from editing." I want to resolve this, and I think it is very possible to resolve! Another statement of yours below. "[It is] whether you can deal with the way the place works. [sic] If can make the shift, welcome, otherwise maybe you should cojnsider being an apiarist. JarrahTree 00:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)" Almost all experts agree that negotiations done in public are almost always a failure because both sides are careful of how they are being perceived by the audience. I am open to resolving our dispute in any way, but I would prefer that you would email me. Thanks CriticalRationalThinking Ryan [Want honey? Don't kick over the beehive]-Carnegie] (talk) Small textReply

Category:Cathedral Square, Perth edit

Re [1][2] - Would it be appropriate to declare Category:Cathedral Square, Perth as {{All included}}? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 16 March 2016 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #201 edit

Geshe Rabten edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Geshe Rabten, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.paperplus.co.nz/author/geshe-rabten-481018.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

maybe a word or two, but not copvio JarrahTree 04:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
maybe not copyvio, but it does rather look like close paraphrasing. Mitch Ames (talk) 05:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Actually I dont have youth on my side, the whole tibetan buddhism area in wp is one vast mess... I give up before I start JarrahTree 01:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 23 March 2016 edit

Wikidata weekly summary #202 edit

The Signpost: 1 April 2016 edit

Thank you edit

Hi JarrahTree, thank you for your message. I'm an editor of the Italian Wikipedia. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Fantastic! Thank you so much --Kenzia (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I take your point. No great hopes, but the more we try the better. Your support for me is very precious, whatever it will happen. Thank you--Kenzia (talk) 12:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi JarrahTree, it is impressive, I've sent plenty of messages asking for suggestions to improve my project, or to have support. Nobody has answered yet. Just you and another person gave your support. Another one asked me plenty of questions, the kind of metrics, delivereable, assessement you warned me about. It's kind of amusing. I'm curious to see where all this will end. Maybe one of your coffee's blackhole... Very happy to have made your acquaintance, anyway. Ciao--Kenzia (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your comment?! edit

Gidday mate! Your User_talk:DadaNeem#hola to me is a bit of a mystery to me, though potentially useful. I do a lot of edits and the link to IBRA doesn't ring any bells, but I imagine it refers to Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia. Please clarify?DadaNeem (talk) 22:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

btw I haven't archived my talk page as yet, just cleaned up the automated stuff that's no longer relevant. How to do?DadaNeem (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tassie Power edit

I see you have been actively collecting content for the Tassie Power crisis. Please remember WP:notablog. A reader should be able to understand the article without reading all 86 cites. A single cite wp:rs will do, per sentence. This should make the article easier to read. BTW keep up the good work and I am sure this article will continue to rapidly improve. Regards CamV8 (talk) 03:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #203 edit

Discussions and deletions edit

Fair point - we'll wait and see whether we keep the article before debating the contents. However, Category:Department of Aboriginal Affairs (Western Australia) is not up for deletion, so we can still discuss that. Mitch Ames (talk) 14:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #204 edit

This Month in GLAM: March 2016 edit





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 14 April 2016 edit

Books & Bytes - Issue 16 edit

  The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

  • New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
  • Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
  • A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
  • Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata weekly summary #205 edit

WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 8 edit

 
Newsletter • March / April 2016

This month:

Transclude article requests anywhere on Wikipedia

In the last issue of the WikiProject X Newsletter, I discussed the upcoming Wikipedia Requests system: a central database for outstanding work on Wikipedia. I am pleased to announce Wikipedia Requests is live! Its purpose is to supplement automatically generated lists, such as those from SuggestBot, Reports bot, or Wikidata. It is currently being demonstrated on WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health (which I work on as part of my NIOSH duties) and WikiProject Women scientists.

Adding a request is as simple as filling out a form. Just go to the Add form to add your request. Adding sources will help ensure that your request is fulfilled more quickly. And when a request is fulfilled, simply click "mark as complete" and it will be removed from all the lists it's on. All at the click of a button! (If anyone is concerned, all actions are logged.)

With this new service is a template to transclude these requests: {{Wikipedia Requests}}. It's simple to use: add the template to a page, specifying article=, category=, or wikiproject=, and the list will be transcluded. For example, for requests having to do with all living people, just do {{Wikipedia Requests|category=Living people}}. Use these lists on WikiProjects but also for edit-a-thons where you want a convenient list of things to do on hand. Give it a shot!

Help us build our list!

The value of Wikipedia Requests comes from being a centralized database. The long work to migrating individual lists into this combined list is slowly underway. As of writing, we have 883 open tasks logged in Wikipedia Requests. We need your help building this list.

If you know of a list of missing articles, or of outstanding tasks for existing articles, that you would like to migrate to this new system, head on over to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Requests#Transition project and help out. Doing this will help put your list in front of more eyes—more than just your own WikiProject.

An open database means new tools

WikiProject X maintains a database that associates article talk pages (and draft talk pages) with WikiProjects. This database powers many of the reports that Reports bot generates. However, until very recently, this database was not made available to others who might find its data useful. It's only common sense to open up the database and let others build tools with it.

And indeed: Citation Hunt, the game to add citations to Wikipedia, now lets you filter by WikiProject, using the data from our database.

Are you a tool developer interested in using this? Here are some details: the database resides on Tool Labs with the name s52475__wpx_p. The table that associates WikiProjects with articles and drafts is called projectindex. Pages are stored by talk page title but in the future this should change. Have fun!

On the horizon
  • The work on the CollaborationKit extension continues. The extension will initially focus on reducing template and Lua bloat on WikiProjects (especially our WPX UI demonstration projects), and will from there create custom interfaces for creating and maintaining WikiProjects.
  • The WikiCite meeting will be in Berlin in May. The goal of the meeting is to figure out how to build a bibliographic database for use on the Wikimedia projects. This fits in quite nicely with WikiProject X's work: we want to make it easier for people to find things to work on, and with a powerful, open bibliographic database, we can build recommendations for sources. This feature was requested by the Wikipedia Library back in September, and this meeting is a major next step. We look forward to seeing what comes out of this meeting.


Until next time,

Harej (talk) 01:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply