Jamiepfi

Welcome!

Hello, Jamiepfi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

PS: The project page can be found at: Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 23:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article

Hello Jamiepfi, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

• Intro sentence: okay, but improvements can be made.
• Links: Please use more internal links! Please look for keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles.
• Headers/paragraphs: A huge text is difficult to read. Consider splitting it up in paragraphs.
• References: Missing! Sources and references are a vital part of Wikipedia articles.
• Context/timeframe: Missing!
• How was the book received: Missing!
• Other: I do not understand the three lines at the bottom of your sandbox, but if you put them there as a temporary draft it is okay, but in the final article they should not be.

I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Jamiepfi, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.

• Intro sentence: okay
• Links: No external links in the text itself, but only at the bottom! Fix this first!
• Headers: Okay, but no need to make the R an capital, lower case please: "Critical Reception".
• References: Sufficient for now, but more sources are welcome! Please add if possible also references in the section "Content" to where certain parts come from in the book, like the chapter or page.
• Context/timeframe: Still missing...
• How was the book received: Good, but may be a bit longer (if possible).

Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 03:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jamiepfi, The image you had requested to be scanned has been kept (and not deleted) because it is too simple to be copyrighted. I just added it to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 02:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)