Jalilsakib

Welcome!

Hello, Jalilsakib, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as PostureAdjuster, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Empire3131 (talk) 19:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PostureAdjuster

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PostureAdjuster requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Empire3131 (talk) 19:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Explanation

The reason I deleted the article is because there was nothing in it that said anything about why the Adjuster is notable. There was no information about why it matters to anyone other than the people who were directly involved in it (oh look, "It was developed by Sakib Jalil", I wonder if there's any connection to the Wikipedia user "Jalilsakib"?).

One of our guidelines is that if you are directly involved with (Item X), then you are the worst person to decide whether (Item X) should have a Wikipedia article, because it's a conflict of interest.

Basically, what you said was: "it's a new computer thing! I made it with a professor, and then we gave a presentation on it at a conference!" ... and nothing else.

Is the government using this? Has Microsoft purchased it from you for $10,000,000? Is it important?

Maybe it is. But you did not say anything about that.

Understand now? DS (talk) 15:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your reply. I didn´t expect disturbing mockery of tone from a wiki administrator. You seem to be making fun by saying its a new computer thing I did with my professor etc which is not nice. Your comments about Microsoft purchasing it? Not nice. Anyway I respect your other comments though.

Lets try to be objective. I am not going to create it anymore following your suggestion. The thailand ergonomic society will do it, so I assure you about conflict of interest issue that you mentioned.

Yes the thai government is using it so we would like to know what kind of notability should be mentioned. 90% of the documents and publications that use it are in thai so we don´t know if we should put that as reference or not.

And where we can find the old version of the deleted article.

Thank you!

The tone was not deliberate mockery; I apologize if you perceived it that way. But these are serious questions. What is it other' than some new computer thing that you made with your professor? [Answer: I don't know, you didn't say.] Could Microsoft have purchased it? [Answer: Yes, they could have - big corporations do purchase things from small independents on occasion.]

As for where you can find the old version of the deleted article: you can't. It's been deleted. I have access to it, but that's because I'm an administrator.

And to be honest, if a new article gets written about it, that new article would do better if it was written entirely as a new article instead of depending on the deleted version. DS (talk) 16:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)