Safe

User:MeMe92

edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Onorem 12:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Alright. Sorry Onorem. It was a joke between me and my friend at school, just messing around. You can delete the page if you want as the user 'MeMe92' will be making his page and doing it up in the style of his life story. Although, if you come across the page and find out that the comments I head written before have now gone, please do not delete, unless of course you have come across any other form of unacceptable content. Thanks, JakobSpooner.

Spelling Mistakes - Spell Check?

edit

Is there a spell check system on Wikipedia? So that people who are poor at spelling can post reasonably well spelt articles and edits. It's just a thought, and if it's already there, please tell me. Thanks, JakobSpooner.


longest word

edit

Donaudampfschiffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft

I bet you don't know what it means fool. Jakob.

HooligansRPG - Habbo

edit

A tag has been placed on HooligansRPG - Habbo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:HooligansRPG - Habbo. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Onorem 12:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Matt Smith

edit

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Matt Smith page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Islomaniac 973 18:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of K dot snype

edit
 

A tag has been placed on K dot snype, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.BencherliteTalk 09:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself, as you did with K dot snype. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 14:23, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mandem

edit

A tag has been placed on Mandem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 14:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


K dot snype

edit

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with K dot snype. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Calton | Talk 14:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Nonsense of Bahutzalongese

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bahutzalongese, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bahutzalongese provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bahutzalongese, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Casey Fearfield

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Casey Fearfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acroterion (talk) 14:48, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Geoff Ogilvy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. michfan2123 (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User:MeMe92. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 11:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The edits you have done to User:MeMe92 and Geoff Ogilvy (not to mention several articles that have already been deleted) are unacceptable. As a consequence, you are hereby blocked for a week; further abuse will result in an indefinite block. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Steven Dunne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 09:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Casey Fearfield

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Casey Fearfield, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. –Capricorn42 (talk) 10:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gripped

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gripped requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jenks24 (talk) 08:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gripped

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gripped requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jenks24 (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MrKIA11 (talk) 09:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Reply