Welcome!

Hello Jackemoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 14:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Stansberry

edit

Please do not recreate this article again with the content you have been using. It is a copyright violation of [1]. Wikipedia does not, in most cases, permit the use of copyrighted material in its articles. Also, it is unlikely that this organization is notable enough to warrant inclusion of an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Notability. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 14:02, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Regarding the copyright issue; you as User:Jackemoe do not represent a copyright authority that can be independently verified as the copyright authority for this material. Since the material is a verbatim copy of one of the pages on the company's website, and since we do not have independently verifiable confirmation that this material has been released under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, we must assume it is a copyright violation. If you would like to make this an official release of information, then please send me an e-mail from a recognizable Stansberry and Associates e-mail address to wikidurin@hotmail.com acknowledging the release of all posted materials under the terms of GFDL. I will then post that release on the article's talk page.
  • Regarding notability; this is often disputed for quite a number of companies who place profiles on Wikipedia. Simply because a company exists does not mean it merits an article on Wikipedia. Notability must be attained. You've made a claim on my talk page that this company is notable because it is one of the top independent financial newsletter and publication companies in the world. This was not presented in the article. Instead, the article has been essentially an introduction followed with a directory of people in the company. If you want to recreate the article, I strongly suggest you include such a claim to notability and cite a basis for that claim on something that is independently verifiable. Also, it is generally not considered to be good form for a company to write its own article. If you're notable enough to have an article on Wikipedia, eventually someone will make the article who is independent of your company and can more likely write from a neutral point of view.
  • Regarding the content of the article; Please understand, Wikipedia is not to be used for indescriminate collections of information. You may wish to review WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information. If the article contained substantially more information about the company, what it does, achievements, publications, etc, then a short listing of the significant people in the company would be appropriate. As is, the listing of the people is dominating the article and making it a directory of personnel at the company rather than an article about the company.
  • If I can be of assistance, please let me know. Thanks, --Durin 14:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

What annoys me is the way that you try to get away with it "on the cheap". If the best you can do is spend a few minutes copy-and-pasting your website, you don't deserve an article here. I have protected the page but if you are actually prepared to spend some time preparing a proper article in Wikipedia style and which establishes the company's notability, feel free to do so at User:Jackemoe/sandbox. When you have done that, contact Durin, or me or any other admin. -- RHaworth 16:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

On second thoughts, don't bother: if you are from Stansberry's the article will still be advertising and WP:VAIN applies. Wait until one of your clients decides to enthuse here about your services. -- RHaworth 16:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Dailywealth

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Dailywealth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 19:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Agora Publishing spam on Wikipedia

edit

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.

Domains


Accounts


Deleted articles


Other articles

--A. B. (talkcontribs) 22:06, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply