User talk:J Milburn/archive7

Latest comment: 16 years ago by LuciferMorgan in topic Re:

This is an archive of past discussions. Please do not edit it, it is for reference purposes only. If you wish to continue a discussion here, please do so on my talk page.

Roitr edit

Just to let you know: User:Tuaser, User:Serbakon, User:Horesmate, User:Terovera and the IP User:79.178.29.168 are all sockpups of Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Roitr. Instructions are: "Block on sight, revert any changes, delete POV forks". --noclador 12:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

San Diego Natural History Museum edit

Hi there. I think you're the editor who's reviewing that page. I've included a comment in the discussion page about it and ask that you review it. Thanks.

San Diego Natural History Museum 2 edit

Hi again. Although I have behaved appropriately in following every rule set out by Wikipedia once understanding some of your basic workings around here and have engaged in discussion with the other individual involved, I can no longer edit the entry. What makes it worse is that his version, which in my opinion does violate Wikipedia rules, remains up. I'm very confused as to what is going on here. How exactly are things supposed to be worked out? The version I last proposed was very reasonable and very much in line with the rules here. The new version I was going to propose because he reverted back to his old version (apparently he can revert without penalty but I cannot), was going to include an article that he himself quotes in the discussion and of which I was unaware until he brought it up. Since he brought it up, and it is agreeable to me, I thought it would lead to compromise. I found that I couldn't publish it at all, which kind of made any further discussion pointless. Can you please explain, here and not over there, why I am being prevented from posting? Thanks again. ````

How do you know? edit

Hello, I would like to know how you know if a persian singer is notable or not? Have you been watching Afghan TV or listen to Persian music? What is the criteria? Thanks

How do i catagorise the article then? I would like to place my article under Living people | Afghan musicians | Afghan singers... Many thanks Softi 10:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)SoftiReply

Thanks for your help! Last question...can I save the article in a draft mode for a while till it is complete. The moment I saved it before, it was published. Can you review the same for me? thanks again! Softi 10:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)SoftiReply

re: STICKAD message edit

Re: I have deleted this as a test page. Should you want to experiment, please use the sandbox, or create your own sandbox within your userspace. Thanks! J Milburn 11:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Huh? WHa??? See this and refigure (my memory is bad, but not, I think, this bad!

If "FrankB"[1] has resurfaced, or if was definitely me, please drop the content in user:Fabartus/temp (One of my MANY sandboxes) Thanks! // FrankB 17:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: Although I really have no idea what you are talking about regarding FrankB resurfacing or the point of linking to Kate's tool, I see that it was originally tests by you at Template talk:X5 that were then moved into the article space by another user for some reason. All the same, a template talk page is hardly the place to test edits. J Milburn 18:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
OIC... Yeah, I agree on the tests... to some extent. I usually blank those save for any 'prepped' content that helps a user understand usage issues. If that was X5, then I moved the development to the commons or meta as the BOT that clears X0-X9 is/was hyperactive making sub-template development all but impossible... things keep vanishing just when you got somewhere. Thanks for the quick answer! At least I don't need to go looking for a brain transplant! // FrankB 18:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Roger yer last too! // FrankB 18:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Whoa! Thanks for pointing out the redirect issue to me. And here I was thinking I was helping out. I don't think I did anything major, but I'll look over it again. Much obliged. Paxsimius 22:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Danny chan image edit

Hi, there was an image on the Danny Chan page that has a license. There was a debate earlier and the image was supposed to stay since the artist is no longer alive. It was also used, how could it fall for WP:CSD#4? Benjwong 01:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bohgizzle edit

Bohgizzling has a large and growing following in the Ottawa and Surrounding area. We have significant photographic evidence of its existence. We would like to document proof of this sport so we may share it with others around the world, by no means is this an attempt to undermine the credibility of wikipedia. We would ask that you please reconsider before deleting.
Yours Truly,
LeighMartell

Non-notable? Raytheon Australia edit

Hi, Just got your message about deleting the Raytheon Australia page. I noticed that there was information about the history of Raytheon Company in the USA and there was no information to help anyone find out about Raytheon Australia.

In light of the huge $$$ being invested in the Defence sector in Australia of late and the recent announcement of the Air Warfare Destroyer Project -- Spanish design to be partly built in Australia/in Europe. I can put a general artice about the players in the Australian Defence industry on a historical basis if that is more appropriate, please advise.

I note that ThalesRaytheonSystems have a simple description...would this be more appropriate?


Chloe Wilson Raytheon Australia 03:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sweet edit

I think you accidently deleted Sweet today, which may have been an empty page because of vandalism. Would you check that please? It should have been a disambiguation or surname page before it got blanked. Thanks. – sgeureka tc 13:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well spotted, I have restored. I have no idea how I deleted that, I was new page patrolling... Thanks for pointing it out to me. J Milburn 13:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please could you reinstate the page on Cameron Reilly who you have deemed of non-notable! As the first Australian podcaster he influences thousands of people every week.I understand that as you live in England you may not have heard of him, try listening to some of his podcasts at http://www.thepodcastnetwork.com/ which to my mind offer the highest quality podcasts available. The Napoleon show is particularly informative and G'Day world will have an extremley beneficial effect on your education. You would get on well as he is an active atheist and tries to convert believers on his show. Good luck with your GCSE's

Species I've been creating edit

Greeting. I'm running a bot that creates new species stubs, based on info at the IUCN Red List. I see that you tagged Northern Yellow Bat, an article I created, as missing categories. I'm not a category expert. The article had the automatic categories "Least Concern Species" and "Bat stubs", although these were only implicit and based on included templates. What categories do you think this article should have? I ask because I'd like to improve my bot, and adding appropriate categories to articles it creates would be helpful. All the best, – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article about Alexander Dobrunov edit

Hello. I created an article about Alexander Dobrunov which you promptly deleted. It was not yet finished. My plan is to create a simple article (a few sentences), and my girlfriend who was a student of Mr Alexander Dobrunov will complete it. Note that Alexander Dobrunov was famous as he was training the Russia national Judo-team.

DYK edit

  On 10 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dungeons & Dragons (album), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Rigadoun (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

aria c jalali article edit

http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/articles/6204.html how's this for a ref? Stan weller 22:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

very good. i shall keep an eye out. Stan weller 22:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • check these out:

http://www.marsneedsguitars.com/2007/04/new-music-from-inbox.html

http://www.losingtoday.com/tales.php?id=145 About half way down the page.

http://www.lemague.net/dyn/spip.php?article3592 French interview with him.

Stan weller 23:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Arts and Sciences Article edit

Hello, I am a relatively new user of Wikipedia and I wrote a very short article about a band: The Arts and Sciences. This article was very short, as they are a new band, and I wrote it hoping that others who know more about this band could expand this article. I understand how this could be misconstrued as "unimportant". I searched for some other lesser-known bands, such as Orson, and found similar type pages to exist as well as the record label under which this band is signed: Daemon Records. As this band is a decently popular and a notarized indie-rock band (many of which don't even get taken on by a record label), I felt that this was note-worthy enough to merit an article. I read the section about "worthy" article topics and felt The Arts and Sciences merited an article.

Could you explain to me what a band must "do" to merit an article? I was about to create some other similar pages about some bands that I have researched and would like to have a formula or "rule of thumb" to determine whether a band is "note-worthy". I am still learning, and would like to know the way in which the Wikipedia community approaches this matter. Thank-you in advance.

--tjameson 03:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

May i re-create my article? edit

Hi! I was just wondering if i could re create my article because:

-The site it was about wasent mine, i'm just a fan of it and thinks it needs an article.

-The site is noteable as one of the largest piczo sites ever

-It is not popular around the internet, but it is one of the most popular piczo sites

So i hope this is enough reasons. i understand that an article on a this subject isnt the best article, But the site isnt mine. i just think it deserves an article.

If i cannot re-create this article, that is fine, but i would prefer to re-make it.

I am not mad at all, not even a tiny bit.

Please respond on my talk page. Thanks!  :)

May i re-create my article? edit

My article is about a band that was short lived but liked by many. You can purchase the album here: http://music.aol.com/artist/a-ten-oclock-scholar/173928/main

I would think that makes them "notable."

I'm not sure. edit

Well since it's an article on the site, i guess the only source would be the site itself.

well, maybe next time :) edit

Well, alright. That was my first article, so i didnt expect it to be saved *laughs* maybe next time. :)

Carlpoke edit

Hello, J Milburn, I am sorry, but may you delete the talk page of carlpoke? Thanks. — Andy W. (talk/contrb.) 02:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Carlpoke will not stand for this.

The Correctonator edit

J Milburn, I'm a new member called The Correctonator. I'm responsible for creating the pages for Terror Toons, it's sequel, and Phantasm V. Just so you know, they are real movies. Don't believe me, search the titles on IMDB.com. Thanks. -The Correctonator

Help! edit

J Milburn, did you happen to read my last post? I mean, I posted links with proof, what more do you want? The thing is, I don't know how to use,contribute and/or create an article on Wikipedia as a user. Can you help me? Thanks again. -The Correctonator

Blatant Advertising? edit

I just recently joined Wiki because my camp counselor said that we didn't have a page here. My article was deleted by you due to "Blatant Advertising." I've removed the external link that I think might have set you off, and I apologize for it. It was not meant to be an advertisement, only something that explains the camp from a camper's POV. --Aerialistic1 04:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

My proof edit

J Milburn, it's me again. Look I've gotten your message and here's the proof that Terror Toons, Terror Toons 2, and Phantasm V exsist: http://imdb.com/title/tt0324213/ http://imdb.com/title/tt0324213/ http://imdb.com/title/tt1054679/

Thank you so musch again. -The Correctonator 7/12/07

I need your help! edit

J Milburn, you keep saying the films exsist. But I still don't understand what your talkin about. Please don't be mad at me. The truth is I'm not a fast learner. I could REALLY use your help please! Thank you so much agian. I'm sorry I keep bugging you. The Correctonator 7/12/07

My new evidence edit

J Milburn, me again. (as always). I've got reviews for Terror Toons and Terror Toons 2: http://www.coldfusionvideo.com/t/terrortoons.html http://www.fatally-yours.com/horror-reviews/terror-toons-2/ And theres a fansite for Phantasm V with some decent news of the movie. Please for keep bothering you. I actually like to do articles on upcoming movies for this site. Thanks sooo much again. -The Correctonator 7/12/07

Deletion Request edit

J Milburn, can you delete the page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WannabeAmatureHistorian/Eda_Pepi . I am the person the page is about. A wikipedia page on this is unnecessary, and makes me quite uncomfortable; I lack notability and relevance, not to mention that the article contains erroneous information (I am not a sociologist). I have also asked the user to deleted this page. Thanks, Edapepi.

A Favor... edit

J Milburn, you send me a message about my evidence and you said you'll get rid of the deletion tags to the pages I created. Can you please get rid of the deletion tags. Thanks again. The Correctonator 7/12/07

Check it out edit

J Milburn, I've updated the pages with The Terror Toons 1 and 2 review links and The Phantasm V fan site. Take a look and tell me if it's O.K. I hope I'm bothering you alot. If I am, I'm apologize. Thanks.

  • -The Correctonator 7/12/07

How would you like to help? edit

Tell you what, how about you help me out with the reliable sources for my pages? I'll create the pages, maybe add a few links, and you can help out adding reliable sources. Thank again.

  • The Correctonator 7/12/07

Added Sources edit

J Milburn, I have now added sources to my pages. Take a look.

  • The Correctonator 7/12/07

The Sources edit

J Milburn, the second source link for Terror Toons 2 has to do with the Shane Ballard, who was an actor for the sequel. The second source link for Phantasm V has confirmation on the fifth film. If those aren't reliable sources, I don't know what is. But I'll get to work on finding a second source link for Terror Toons. Just please don't get mad with me. I'm doing the best I can.

  • The Correctonator 7/12/07

Re: draft of Eda Pepi edit

J Milburn, I doubt the person claiming as Pepi is actually the person in question. However, since I can't locate additional information to complete this draft, it is best to delete it. Thanks. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:WannabeAmatureHistorian/Eda_Pepi&action=edit) (WannabeAmatureHistorian 23:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC))Reply

Hey man edit

 

I saw you removing all the fair use images from Jimi Hendrix discography. It's a bitch to do it, but good job doing the right thing. Right now I'm going through a lot of artist and discography pages looking for album covers to get rid of and other bad images. I got your back. Keep up the good work.++aviper2k7++ 04:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


My updates edit

J Milburn, I have just updated the Terror Toons, Terror Toons 2, and Phantasm V pages. Take a look. Also, promise you won't be mad but, I've got rid of the deletion tags for the pages I made.

  • -The Correctonator 7/13/07

J Milburn, I've updated my Phantasm V page. Check it out. Also are the pages I created here to stay?

  • The Correctonator 7/14/07

Image:KoreaCyclingFederation.png edit

A fair use rational, including all parts required by the policy, is included on the image page. Read it. Mauls 22:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I've read the guideline. It's a logo. Of an organisation. Illustrating article about that organisation. With source. What's your problem? Or are you always so unhelpful? Mauls 00:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Maybe I'm being a bit 'stabby' (as you put it) because you're not exactly being helpful. I've read the guideline, and I believe my rational is sufficient. You clearly believe otherwise. However, just saying "you're wrong" repeatedly isn't going to help me see where I'm going wrong, is it? Mauls 18:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Mauls

Request for help edit

We are approaching an edit war in the article Student over the inclusion of a particular photo being use to represent student pranks I was wondering if you would be willing to take a look at the article and the discussion on the discussion page and add your POV regarding the use of this particular image; if the article is better with or without the image. Your student status should bring a fresh POV to the subject as opposed by my 55 year old POV. Thank you for your assistance in the past. Dbiel (Talk) 05:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the time to review the article and to add your comments. Thanks for setting me straight on one point as well, that of discussion vs vote. It is a slow learning process to learn all the features of Wikipedia and how to use them properly. Thanks for your on going willingness to help.
While I am on the subject of vote, I was wondering if you would consider adding your vote to the article University of Saskatchewan request to be considered for acceptance as part of the Wikipedia:Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive#University of Saskatchewan. They are celebrating their centenial this year and moving the article to feature status would add to that celebration.
Thank you again for your input on Student and also for considering this additional request. Dbiel (Talk) 15:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Our battle in article Student continues over of the use of a specific image. Thanks for your previous input. Would you be willing to review the current state of the discussions and add your thoughts on how best to proceed? Thank you Dbiel (Talk) 03:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Voltaire (musician) delisting proposal edit

Hello J Milburn. I regret that I'm flying in, a stormy petrel, with dark mutterings about Voltaire (musician)'s Good Article status. When you are settled again, after holidays, take a look at the link under 'dark mutterings.' for my particular issues concerning delisting. Since you are on holiday, and seem to be the principle editor on this article, I'm willing to be lenient on the timing on this. I've certainly enough to keep me busy. But in the long run, I think your original sense about the article was correct. It was a bit premature for a Good Article rate. On the other hand, I don't think the rate is out of reach. In the meantime, enjoy yourself; drop me a note when you are able. Take care — Gosgood 00:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

welcome back edit

Hi J Milburn, welcome back from your hols. Thought I'd better let you know of a couple of changes that have gone on in Barrow-related articles. First off, I've proposed List of Primary Schools in Barrow-in-Furness for deletion (discussion here), thought you might like to have a look at it and see what you think (I think some inclusionsists are weighing in blindly). Also I've created (or expanded) Category:Furness so it's easier to track local articles and bring the general standard up. I've added a to-do list to the Barrow-in-Furness talk page, can you add anything you think is particularly pressing? Ki | jog 07:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, your name change proposal definitely makes sense, but it might be difficult to extricate all the links in the hierarchy. Category:People from Barrow-in-Furness (i.e Births) seems to be a subcategory of Category:People from Barrow-in-Furness by settlement (i.e Residents) but by rights they should be at the same 'level'. I think we will have to think how we will organise everything. Ki | jog 10:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
BTW, agree with you on the idea on a Portal, although think the priority should be bringing up a couple more articles to Good Article status before we do that. Ki | jog 10:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I'd already referenced it....

His first professional role was in repertory during school holidays at the age of 17 as Sheriff in The Rainmaker (1957, Her Majesty's Theatre, Barrow in Furness). He played one other part during that summer before going on to train for two years as a maths teacher! But teaching wasn't the life for Peter and he returned to Barrow in 1961 as a permanent member of the company.

Spending two years learning his trade in weekly rep. (that's performing a new play every week) he appeared in 96 plays playing everything from Malvolio in Twelfth Night to leading roles in the Whitehall Farces. He describes his time in Barrow as the hardest work, the most fun and the least money he has ever had in his life.

Leaving Barrow to try his luck in London his first job was to play the Doctor in Witness for the Prosecution at the Wimbledon Theatre. He followed that with a three-month spell in the chorus in the Charlie Drake vehicle, Man in the Moon at the London Palladium. He recalls it "was a total disaster from day one until it came off nine months earlier than scheduled".

Aim (musician) gallery edit

Hi. You recently removed the album cover images that were in a gallery on the article page of this musician. All of the images have rationale, and all but one of them have their own album article, though the one in question is now orphaned so at present it looks like that will end up being deleted. Is there something I can do to allow these album images to appear on the artist's article? If I added some information about each release, could it then be accompanied by an image of the relevant album cover (E.g. as in articles like Queen (band) and Kiss (band))? Is it just because it's in a gallery format that it's not allowed? Cheers. Gram123 16:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Liss Junior School edit

I have noticed you have removed the speedy deletion tag on this article - I am not sure I agree with the removal, but I have WP:PRODed it instead, if it is contested I will take it to AFD. Camaron1 | Chris 10:56, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

filmography edit

took it because I'm planning to prose the whole lot and include them in a TV section of the culture part (after I have done the music one.) I will also add the notable people in as well, (killing two birds with one stone :-) ) I reckon that is the way to go. Msg me if you think not. Ki | jog 21:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Home Straight? edit

Good work on the Library section, I think we are getting to the final stretch before we can nominate it. I've added what I think we have left to do to the 'to do' box. I've printed off the article (as per Tony1's recommendation) and given it a good going over for prose and copyediting but I am going to hold that back until we have completed all the other large scale edits. What do you reckon, are we close? Ki | jog 12:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agree. enough stuff to get our teeth into.
Rewrite of intro? I suggest moving the first sentence of the second par into the first. Hence, first par would be location, second origin of town and third recent history. Paragraphs should have a uniting theme.
What are you thoughts on the demographics section. I could see it as a thorn in our side for any attempts to get GA, any thoughts on how to proceed? Anon user doesn't seem to be 'biting' my attempts to involve him in consensus. Ki | jog 13:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

D&D album reference edit

Hi J. I am not sure what you mean by not trusting my reference. I only see one interview for your references, and quite a bit of the article is redundant (no offense). But it restates the process of how the band decided to do this cd two and three times, and keeps using the same reference over and over again. I don't see any reference from an external source about how they met, when they met, what game convention you are talking about, and even if Wizards contacted them or what. The only thing I see is a quote from one Wizards person who simply stated he liked the music and was glad the band was doing the album. For all that says, it could just be a licensed thing like their other gigs. What is wrong with the letter I referenced? It just shows that their producer started the ball rolling with Wizards, and I think it's important and interesting to see. It's the only thing I could find that was actually in someone else's words, other than the band's. Give it some thought. I really think it's a valuable reference for this article and shows a good progression of how things happened. I also found something in Germany that refers to another album for D&D. And also D&D released an earlier soundtrack, many years ago, that was music for the game, so this one is not the first. I'll try to hunt that down as well. Ooops, this is in reference to the article at. Dungeons & Dragons (album). Ebonyskye 21:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

In answer to your reply on my talk page: I just thought that the summary was redundant in terms of the concept part. I thought the summary was for describing the album, the music, in broad terms, then the details come later in the article. As it is, the summary jumps right into how it was licensed or how the band was approached at a convention. Since I didn't write that part, I felt a little awkward completely rewriting it myself, so I just placed my reference where the sentence began about how the band was approched by Wizards. Seeing that their producer actually made contact in 1999, long before the D&D cd, or even before the Vampyre cd, I just placed it in order, which would obviously come before they were approached by Wizards. As to the reference I used, yes, I believe it is an actual business letterhead, but it seems casual (notice it is handwritten and signed, but not dated), like a friendly response, as opposed to something contractual.

I doubt that anyone in the band would want the entire webpage used as reference, as it covers other issues with a past member, but the letter shows the WotC letterhead and business card, plus a postal stamp and obviously refers to the Born of the Night cd. An email, comes later that refers to the Realm of Shadows cd. If you want the page it links from, that's here[2]. It's way at the bottom of the page.

As for the other cd, I was talking to a friend yesterday and he mentioned getting a cd back in the 80s that was an official D&D soundtrack (not very good by today's standards). The title was something really plain sounding, like "music for gaming" or "music for D&D". Typical 80s space music. I'll have to ask him exactly what it was and maybe find it on Amazon or someplace.Ebonyskye 07:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi J. Please see the Talk page for the D&D album to read a list of other previous official soundtracks Talk:Dungeons & Dragons (album) Ebonyskye 03:21, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dungeons & Dragons (album) edit

Hello, J Milburn. Per WP:Verifiability, I don't believe the reference you recently added to the Dungeons & Dragons (album) article is appropriate. That is a website created by Joseph Vargo and his girlfriend Christine Filipak and the sole aim of the entire site is to discredit Midnight Syndicate and it's founder, Edward Douglas. There is no editorial oversight and, from my review of the site, it contains blatant factual errors. Just thought I should pass that along. Thanks! Skinny McGee 19:36, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Considering that the Legion site also references that the band member Edward Douglas is actually using Wikipedia to promote some kind of alternate history of the band[3], I would take the above comment with a grain of salt. I for one see a lot of misleading information being promoted by Midnight Syndicate. Maybe it's just how they word things, or how they leave certain facts out, but take for example their claim about being the first offically licensed D&D soundtrack. They aren't. I think there's a great deal of propaganda going around. It's not the first time a band has tried to promote themselves on Wikipedia. I don't think the sole aim of the Legion site is to discredit anyone. It's really blunt, but it's very straightforward in that they only want to get the truth out there.[4]. I suppose it's a way of discrediting whatever false propaganda is being spread. Ebonyskye 03:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: edit

I read your message on the Metal Project as concerns being given a job to do. What kind of job are you looking for? I'm sure I can find something where your great skills would benefit the Project, though if you gave a better idea I could maybe come up with some ideas :) LuciferMorgan 21:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I'm not really Project leader, as I haven't even committed my signature to the Project yet. As concerns what I think needs to be done... well, I would be here forever stating what.
As concerns a peer review system, this is certainly something I wish to set up. Primarily, so that inexperienced editors would submit their article and maybe people like you and me could nurture them into honing their skills. I'm currently trying to work out how to implement this, though I wish to move things at a slow yet steady pace.
You said you prefer smaller bands with an unambiguous name, so I've been trying to think of maybe a side project. There's a side project called Chrome Division, and they've released one lone album. It's a decent album (evidently influenced by Motorhead), and I also interviewed their singer for a known Metal website (that article will come in very handy - it's in the external links). This is a smaller band yet has a slightly larger importance (only slight) as their singer is also the singer of Dimmu Borgir. I'd suggest trawling for webzine interviews, and typing Chrome Division into the search engine of www.blabbermouth.net. Does that band take your fancy at all, or maybe something else? LuciferMorgan 21:25, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Cool, that sounds great. I have a print review of their sole album, which may come in handy. Also, as an interviewer, I have access to the official press release as regards the album. It's a .doc file though - can you open them? I'll send it to you via email when I know what your email address is (feel free to email me to confirm your address). Once you've given this a try, should you want any other tasks feel free to get in touch. You have great skills, and I'm only too happy to keep you aboard wherever possible :) LuciferMorgan 21:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Just noticed your sandbox... I wouldn't recommend a musical style section for this band - that's in light of the fact they've only released a sole album. LuciferMorgan 22:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Christ, you work quick! Apart from one or two minor haggles, I'd say it's definitely GA worthy already. Later on today, I'll type up and send the print review for you to use. LuciferMorgan 09:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Peer review is up as we speak. It's linked on the main Project page. I agree that yours would be a great first article to submit, so feel free to do so. LuciferMorgan 11:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for submitting the peer review, which is warmly appreciated. I'll be periodically leaving feedback at your peer review, as I'm not one to write one long review in a single go - I intend to leave one or two comments at a time. I hope this is ok. LuciferMorgan 12:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

How do you feel things are going with the article thus far? I hope the Black Metal / credibility mix up with the interview and so on hasn't put you off or anything - if so, I apologise. I wasn't too bothered about the mix up anyway, so have no worries. LuciferMorgan 22:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)Reply