J Lorraine

(Untitled)

Good work on the Suzuki article, thank you. Chelseaboy 10:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

(Untitled II)

Thanks for your encouragement on the violin article! Well on the way to addiction meself... muito obrigado! Just plain Bill 23:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:John_S_Gibson_Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John_S_Gibson_Jr.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

To Lorraine

The music played on that video game is not a popular music, it actualy is trying to made the heroine of the game to be in relation with the classic style. I don't know what to do. I don't know many things about music but this game made me to love the violin so I wnated to pay back somehow to this game, to make an article about the beautiful music that is played on that game. Thank you Lorraine. --Locke 22:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Hello fellow musician!

Just dropping in to say hi. Lady Nimue of the Lake 07:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Concerning Jeffrey Irvine notability

The article was originally nominated for a speedy deletion on the grounds that no notability was asserted. His association with CIM, in my estimation, was some assertion of notability. At the time, the article did not have much additional information.

An article's nomination WP:AFD does not mean that the article will be deleted. It is review process.

Expanding the article with more information about Irving, especially notability, is important. I've reviewed the CIM bio. There is more information there that can be included to expand on his notabilty — chaired position at CIM, association with Oberlin, Master teacher, etc. The words "teacher" and "player" are nouns that don't do justice. Perhaps, professor and violist; or renown viola master teacher, CIM professor, international performer ...

— ERcheck (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Please see Aaron Jones now I have added a bit of detail - he is a noted Irish bouzouki player but someone has put the areticle up for deletion -ridiculous. Ernst Stavro Blofeld ^{"I've been expecting you"} 13:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Superintendents

I noticed that you have previously been involved in editing Category:Superintendents, which appears to be intended for state and local school superintendents in the United States. The current category name seems to be vague, and I was wondering if I could get your opinion on changing it to something more specific, although I am not entirely sure what the name should be changed to. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Also not sure. The people in the category are indeed identified as "superintendents" or "education superintendents" or "school superintendents" on their respective pages. Perhaps a link to Superintendent (education) on the category page? I can't think of anything more specific at the moment J Lorraine (talk) 09:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MuPhiEpsilonShield.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:MuPhiEpsilonShield.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Teachers of computer science

Category:Teachers of computer science, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

They're both small and meant to encourage good character through learning

That is all.75.161.80.119 (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

luthier

Please help me stop an editor from violating WP:ENGVAR by censoring well-sourced information about US usage. Ironically he even feels authorised to remove Oxford Dictionary information that he feels is wrong. --Espoo (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Edward Kreitman

The article Edward Kreitman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Seems purely promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 08:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Theology teachers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Theology teachers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, J Lorraine. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, J Lorraine. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, J Lorraine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:English teachers has been nominated for discussion

Category:English teachers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:02, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Category:Philosophy teachers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Philosophy teachers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 07:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)