Wrongfully blocked edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JTC22 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not Guns & Glory. The main purpose of me joining Wikipedia is to add useful contributions. I even tried fixing Guns & Glory's mistake on the AS Val and VSS Vintorez article. I oppose to his changes, yet I was blocked for being him? How is that even make sense? JTC22 (talk) 01:46, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

CU verified abuser of multiple accounts. Quite obvious. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I didn't check when I did the initial block since Dreamy Jazz had already. I rechecked on appeal because I wanted to see the specifics since I did see a few differences and was double checking the behaviour. You are now   Confirmed to Guns & Glory, as such, this is now a CheckUser block. Any other CU can follow my log - see the IP I did get edits on and look at the history there. Should allow you to confirm as well, put poke me if you disagree. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:13, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply