Image:Solution.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Solution.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Solution goat car.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Solution goat car.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —MetsBot 19:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

monty hall image

edit

Hi - You wrote:

Hi,
I've just come across your discussion on the origin of the Monty Hall problem picture. You were pondering over whether either Robert Saunders or I were the original 'artist'. May I ask why you are wondering this? For the record, I put together the original image which then Robert Saunders copied and reduced the file size. I felt rather 'sore' at this because it would appear that he created the original, whereas if you look deep into the page history you will see that my image predates all his.

I nominated Monty Hall problem as a featured article candidate and one of the comments was about the copyright status of the images (which was what the original query was about). I ended up doing new images for the solution, based on the PD image created by user:aarchiba (:Image:Monty-hall.png), partially to address the copyright status but also to clean up the image (the one that was there was kind of noisy at the pixel level). The new image also doesn't have any text which makes it more useful for non-English versions of Wikipedia. I ended up putting a "presumed GFDL" on Robert's images, but haven't been able to contact him. Was your version recently deleted as part of the great image cleanup campaign? -- Rick Block (talk) 23:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferrari_F356.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

June 2010

edit

  Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Watt. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. Jc3s5h (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of linguistic example sentences may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *If it is it, it is it. If it is, it is it, it is! (If an object is the object, it is the object. If it is the object, then it is the object, it is!
  • *Badger's badgers badgers Badger's badgers (Mr Badger's badgers (his animals) badgers (annoys) Mr Badger's badgers (his other animals)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply