Who are you? Old user, new name? - Tournesol (talk) 21:01, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, I saw your other message now. - Tournesol (talk) 21:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alexey Pivovarov edit

 

The article Alexey Pivovarov has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sparthorse (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

That's not vandalism. Every Wikipedia article must be verifiable. In particular, every article that is about living people must have sources. Asking you to comply with the rule is not "trolling" as you put it. Please read the basic rules of Wikipedia and in particular, read WP:BLP. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Thats not vandalism thats beauracracy(--Islamocid (talk) 21:27, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
No, I proposed it for deletion. I did not delete it. You have seven days to address the issue in the notice. The source you added does no even mention Pivovarov, so does not meet Wikipedia's standards for reliable sources. The article must have at least one source. Please do not remove the propose deletion notice until you have supplied one. Thanks, Sparthorse (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • You re horrible. New source you like at last?--Islamocid (talk) 21:31, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you want to avoid running afoul of the rules, try reading them before you create articles. There are good reasons why these rules are in place. They are explained in the articles you clearly haven't bothered reading. Personal insults will not get you anywhere. Sparthorse (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • New reference you like? Will not attack my article again and try to delete it?--Islamocid (talk) 21:39, 25 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 19:34, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Alexey Pivovarov edit

Hello, Islamocid, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Alexey Pivovarov, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Sparthorse (talk) 19:40, 26 November 2011 (UTC)Reply