October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Justin-Siena High School

edit

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Justin-Siena High School with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 17:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Justin-Siena High School with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 18:21, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Justin-Siena High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Speedy deletion nomination of Picolas Cage

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Picolas Cage, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO   A&E 17:42, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Justin-Siena High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  GILO   A&E 21:00, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013 (2)

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  SpencerT♦C 21:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Intenyun, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Oddbodz (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

edit
 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Intenyun, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Oddbodz (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply