IntelligentUniverse
Unblock edit
IntelligentUniverse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There has been a debate going on at my IP address page: 86.10.119.131 Basically a user called "AngloPyramidologist" was banned, he is my brother a univsity student, he was banned for swearing it seems, now as already mentioned this was nothing to do with me, i own an account "IntelligentUniverse" and this is nothing to do with Anglo. If you look at the log in times, already put up you will see we have been editing completey different articles at the same times in the past, this is becuase i am not a sock, we are different people, on completey different computers, and i am nothing to do with his account or his wikipedia interests. I am requesting an unblock becuase i am Not Anglo, so i do not deserve to be banned. Thanks.
IntelligentUniverse (talk) 13:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You very well might not be User:Anglo Pyramidologist. You very well are the indefinitely blocked User:Liveintheforests. jpgordon::==( o ) 14:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- This block was based on checkuser evidence, which pointed to the two accounts being the same. However, if the story about the two users being brothers is true, similar technical evidence would be expected. If the reviewing admin checks the two accounts behavior (a perusal of User talk:86.10.119.131 may assist with this) and believes they are different people, I have no problem with an unblock. TNXMan 13:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
IntelligentUniverse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not denying being liveintheforests, that is an old account i used at college to write articles about richard milton and other lamarckists for college work, i no longer use that account. Even so, why am i perm blocked? I am not Anglo and if you look at Anglos page it says the reason he was perm blocked was for personal attacks aka swearing. This has nothing to do with me or my account, i admit that i have had two accounts (i now just just one), but i no longer use the other, i do not deserve a perm block for that? I recieved no warning or anything, and the person who made the block, blocked me becuase they were thought i was Anglo, but i am not him so do not deserve a perm ban, i have not abused wikipedia, i am not a vandal and i have made many good edits. I am not Anglo and i have not personally attacked anyone. IntelligentUniverse (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Whether or not you are Anglo, or Anglo's brother, that doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is that you were Liveintheforests, and that account doesn't have a clean history. Allowing you to edit from this account is an attempt to avoid scrutiny. If you want to request an unblock, do it on your original account. -- Atama頭 19:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Well, that does it for me. Liveintheforests is a pretty clear sock of Anglo, per TnXMan and the duck test, so if you claim it I can only conclude that you are also Anglo. So, if you want an unblock, I suggest emailing unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org to get one on your main account. Cheers. lifebaka++ 17:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Where's the SPI case that ties in User:Liveintheforests? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- There isn't one; I was doublechecking Tnxman's findings and saw Liveintheforests in the results. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, ta - I'm just concerned that Tnxman's comment "However, if the story about the two users being brothers is true, similar technical evidence would be expected" should apply to Liveintheforests just as much as to IntelligentUniverse - but I guess we'll see over at the Liveintheforests talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- There isn't one; I was doublechecking Tnxman's findings and saw Liveintheforests in the results. --jpgordon::==( o ) 22:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I've been having a look back over the writing styles of Anglo Pyramidologist, Liveintheforests and IntelligentUniverse, and Anglo Pyramidologist's style does seem to be somewhat different from the other two - the sentence structure is much better, for example -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Where's the SPI case that ties in User:Liveintheforests? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:56, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am not Anglo though. AngloPyramidologist is a history student in real life, he edited history related topics, and yes ethnic and also racial based topics from the bible. I have never done this and have no interest in his edits or interests and i am nothing to do with his account or edits, the only thing i have ever edited is anything related to aliens, paranormal theories, alternative science and lamarckism. I am not Anglo yet my account IntelligentUniverse is banned, my IP address is banned, i have no idea why still. I am not a sock of Anglo, if you dig up the old archive case for socks on Anglo this was also covered last easter, it was revealed we are not the same user. Also please look at our editing histories - You will see completey different topics being edited on wikipedia at the same times, this is becuase of seperate computers and we are not the same person at all. I know it is not helpful that he was editing from this same house, but nothing can be done about that, that is what happens when he comes home from university but as mentioned his edits are nothing to do with me or my account, next thing i know i am banned for doing nothing and accused of being a sock of him and everything including the IP and my account is perm banned. IntelligentUniverse (talk) 18:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
IntelligentUniverse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
An admin has typed this " Whether or not you are Anglo, or Anglo's brother, that doesn't matter to me. What matters to me is that you were Liveintheforests, and that account doesn't have a clean history. Allowing you to edit from this account is an attempt to avoid scrutiny. If you want to request an unblock, do it on your original account" - But this is all completey wrong
1. It DOES matter that i am NOT Anglo !!!!- Becuase the reason i have been banned and the only reason is becuase the admin blocked me thinking i was Anglo, when i am not. 2. I have not denied being liveintheforests, that is an old account - What does this have to do with anything???? It has nothing to do with my banning. I was never perm blocked on that account, i have a positive clean history, i only had one problem on that account over a minor issue, i was never perm banned, again this has nothing to do with anything and as previously mentioned i no longer use that account. 3. Avoid scutiny? I don't know what you are on about!! I have been banned becuase an admin thought i was Anglo not for anything else, i am not Anglo though, so i should be unblocked!! Please get an admin to look at this, my account is blocked for "being a sockpuppet of Anglo" when i am not Anglo, i am not a sock, everything was fine before all this happened, i am nothing to do with Anglo and my account does not deserve to be banned.IntelligentUniverse (talk) 19:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As others have said, you cannot create a new account to evade a block. You must go back to User Talk:Liveintheforests and request unblock there. This account will remain closed. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Atama is likely referring to your one week block on May 23 on Liveintheforests, for personal attacks. If you claim that account, then the timeline would mean that it was blocked when you created this account, so you were using this account to bypass your block. I believe he is telling you to request unblocking there, but as TnXMan has not reenabled your talk page access there that won't be possible. lifebaka++ 20:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- My bad. I'll enable talk page access for Liveintheforests. And yes, I'm referring to that block and all the previous behavior that led up to the block (harrassment, etc.). This doesn't seem to be a situation where a clean start should be provided, so you should stick to your first account. Again, I'm enabling the talk page of that account so you can make the unblock request (and your case) there. -- Atama頭 20:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- ...Never mind, the talk page access is already there. The block has talk page access allowed for that account, and the talk page is unprotected, so Liveintheforests just has to log in to have access to their user talk page. In fact the last edit to that talk page was Liveintheforests, who blanked it. -- Atama頭 20:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Robin Collyns for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robin Collyns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Collyns until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)