Info845

Welcome to my talk page. Any complaints, or whatever, can be posted here. Have fun. Info845 21:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

FFXII

I don't care how involved he was in production, Kawazu is not qualified to make a judgment on the will of "the fans". It's impossible, that's why I (and many others) have removed it. No one person can say absolutely what "the fans" definitively think. Axem Titanium 21:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I take it back. I think the last version you made was perfectly fine. Axem Titanium 21:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Alright, alright. I dropped the "fans" line in compromise (because, dude, seriously, the game was in development for over 5 years. Nothing about it was rushed) but just...off the record, I guess, if Japanese fans were as vocal as American fans about the game's plot, I can see why the producer would feel the need to mention it. Info845 23:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Glad this is sorted out. Axem Titanium 01:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Sonic '06

Please review my edits more fully. At least acknowledge that they contained spelling corrections and proper formatting of the existing unformatted references. –Gunslinger47 07:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, then if you could go in and make those improvements to the current version (without deleting almost every quote, lol,) it would be great. Thanks for the help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Info845 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, good job. Looks a lot better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Info845 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the acknowledgment, but it would be nice if you avoid blanket reverts in the future. You shouldn't revert all changes if you object to only one aspect of it. See Wikipedia:Reverting#When to revert for more information.

Oh, and if it's not too late, I'd like to thank you for your work on the section. I've been maintaining this section alone since December 2006. It's nice to have some company. :) –Gunslinger47 06:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hm, maybe I can give you some extra links while I'm here. Help:Diff explains how to review the exact changes that are made to a page, this is useful for parsing edits. Further basic help can be found through Wikipedia:Welcome. –Gunslinger47 06:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

There are still some changes that should be made to the first paragraph. What I'm eyeing the last sentence: "However, the game received a score of 30 out of 40 for the Xbox 360 version and 29 out of 40 for the PS3 version from the Japanese gaming publication, Famitsu." This seems like a poor use of "however" considering that 30/40 is an incredibly mundane score from Famitsu. The "average" review score for a video game is 75%. I made a helper page at User:Gunslinger47#Average game rankings to help explain this to previous editors.

Also, as a quick side note, you may want to read Wikipedia:Signatures for help signing your comments. –Gunslinger47 18:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:17, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

South Park credits

Please do not remove information from infoboxes without explaining why they are incorrect. Thank you. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 15:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article A Thousand Suns, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 13:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to The Butterfly Effect. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Album sources

Reviews are in fact sources, especially for album articles, as most of album anaylsis/commentary (and all for recent albums) comes from review sources (Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources). Three sources support the statement. Here's another one along those lines. I can consider changing it to something like "a larger emphasis on singing than on Thank Me Later"? But reviews are the sources for these kind of things. Dan56 (talk) 02:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Info845. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Info845. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)