Welcome!

Hello, IndyObserver, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Tom (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've been edit warring at Fox News Channel

edit

See WP:AN3#User:IndyObserver reported by - Barek (talk • contribs) - (Result: ). Your edits broke the WP:3RR rule on October 12, and usually a warning or a block is issued when that happens. You seemed to have gone away, but now you're back. You may be able to avoid a block if you will promise to stop edit warring on that article. For instance, you could propose changes on the article talk page, and wait for at least one person to support your edit before making the change. Another way would be to just stop editing there for a week or two. EdJohnston (talk) 04:21, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

You have been Blocked for Disruptive editing and Edit warring. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.--Hu12 (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Continued disruption

edit
Immediatly after block expired;
 
You have been Blocked again for Disruptive editing. Repeatedly you have been warned and have chosen in pursuit of a certain point, to reject community input and consensus that your edits are disruptive. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.--Hu12 (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IndyObserver (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What's this, a two-revert rule? It's somehow my fault that the person I was discussing the change with on Talk happened to consent to it around the time your block expired?

Decline reason:

Per Hu12's explanation below. Looking at your edit history, it's hard not to think you're a single-purpose account. And lest you accuse me of bias, I'm a registered Democrat and a Kossack. Blueboy96 21:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to Reviewing Admin

edit
See - Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:IndyObserver_reported_by_-_Barek_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29_-_.28Result:_24h.29
Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. IndyObserver, based on their (short) edit history, seems to exist for the sole or primary purpose of pushing a particular POV edit. This block is the result of IndyObserver attempting to win a content dispute through brute force, withought clear consensus. This behavior constitutes clear edit warring and is disruptive. 3RR is a limit, not an entitlement. Understand this does not imply that reverting three times or fewer is acceptable. people can be blocked for edit warring or disruption even if they do not revert more than three times per day. Three revert is not to be construed as a defense against action taken to enforce the Disruptive editing policy.--Hu12 (talk) 20:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)Reply