Welcome!

Hello, Ianglover63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010 edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Louise Glover. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


  Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Louise Glover, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Louise Glover, you may be blocked from editing. Glover did not receive community service; she received a 30-week suspended sentence, and the 'Sky' article backs that up. Any further such whitewashing of the article will result in your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 14:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Louise Glover, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Louise Glover was changed by Ianglover63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955736 on 2010-11-18T10:12:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Glover. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Louise Glover was changed by Ianglover63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960531 on 2010-11-18T10:24:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louise Glover, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Louise Glover, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Louise Glover was changed by Ianglover63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2010-11-18T10:39:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

In general, we don't delete articles on the subject's request. If the article is inaccurate, I recommend you to see this page, and send a message to the info-en-q[at]wikimedia.org mailing list. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 10:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Problems with Louise's article edit

Hello. I can understand that you're frustrated by the way Wikipedia appears to work, but please be reassured that editors here want articles to be factually accurate. If you have specific issues with the article, you could list them here, or if you want to discuss this further, feel free to leave me a message or email me. All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply