IIBxtrerII
Welcome! edit
Getting StartedTutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Remove this hindu nationalist constantly involved in sikh pages edit
pretty clear you are a Hindu nationalist, dont worry all your sock puppets will be rooted out as you falsely accuse others of sockpuppetry based on unfounded claims, you reported "jat Sikh" for caste promotion? let me remind you unlike you Hindus Sikhs don't have castes, jat is widely considered an ethnicity. Furthermore, you vying for "easily accessible" sources for todar mal on Mata Gujris article only further reveals your hidden agenda, seek help. SabhSaaab (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC) SabhSaaab
- I didn't falsely accuse you, for one you deleted Kelownatopdog's talk page, why would another editor allow someone else to delete stuff from his talk page and you three all have the same editing on just a select few pages of Punjabi Canadian gangs and jhatka and Bindy Johal which raised some eyebrows for me IIBxtrerII (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022 edit
Your recent editing history at Vaisakhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)