Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Sheva Mitzvot Bnei Noach

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Sheva Mitzvot Bnei Noach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mifter (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. It's just that there wasn't any comprehensible text in the article. It looks as if had been cut and pasted from another source as well. Sorry to be so blunt in the warning notice, but with all the multiple repostings we get clobbered with around this site, a good faith edit like yours sometimes gets caught up in the ruckus. Anyway, feel free to recreate the article, but take a look at WP:YFA first. That will give you a good idea of what needs to go into your first article. If you need any help, please feel free to give a yell. Regards, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question: Would it be easier for you if I were to undelete the content? Nothing posted here is ever lost, so restoring it will only take a moment. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your email

edit

I don't answer emails unless there's a good reason that the communication can't be handled on talk pages. Also, please use English when attempting to communicate with me. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply