June 2010

edit

  This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Fearne Cotton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. magnius (talk) 22:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for creating attack pages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 22:14, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wikipedia:Attack page has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 21:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lorenna hunter

edit
 

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fearne Cotton. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Happysailor (Talk) 21:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at There'll Always Be An England (DVD), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. magnius (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "Loreeena Hindu"

edit
 

A page you created, Loreeena Hindu, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jusdafax 21:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

December 2010

edit

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Halo (series), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:31, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2011

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=beacuse its fun, this is past, this is on my uni application if i dont have wiki i have nothing}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhullandemu 22:46, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
This isn't a properly formatted unblock request. And for which University do you intend using your Wiki experience to support your application? As far as I know, Budleigh Salterton doesn't have a University, but even they would have some standards. Rodhullandemu 23:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)Reply