User talk:Hunan201p/Archive 2

Blocked by ST47

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 01:53, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: @ST47: OK, I have no plans to contest that. However, I suspect the following account is a sock and ban evader:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1008:B022:A38F:3143:A630:51B0:D37C -- Hunan201p (talk) 07:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Another IP editor shows up suddenly to revert edit war "to x version" which conveniently reverts legitimate edits I made that were detailed on the talk page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashina_tribe&action=history

The contested statement:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ashina_tribe#%22However,_many_sources_also_describe_the_Ashina_as_having_Turkic_origins.[19]%22 -- Hunan201p (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC) @EvergreenFir: @ST47:

I see. Thank you for pointing that out. I'll report that to SPI. EvergreenFir (talk) 16:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Dear @EvergreenFir: I am sorry to bother you, but I am noticing more suspicious activity on Wikipedia, which I believe is indicative of coordinated sockpuppetry.

Today, interestingly just a day after I was banned, another user who I was involved in a dispute with several weeks ago, "TrynaMakeADollar", reverted some edits that I had removed, which were approved by wiki admin DrMies.

Please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genghis_Khan&action=history

Drmies says explicitly that the edits by TrynaMakeADollar are not sufficiently referenced, (and "TrynaMakeADollar" didn't add any new content to the references in her latest edit): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Genghis_Khan#Wives_and_concubines

Interestingly, "TrynaMakeADollar" added a link at the "wives and children" section of the Genghis Khan article, which goes to the "Descent from Genghis Khan" article which DerekHistorian and I were warring over. Around the same time, a new IP user reverted that page to DerekHistorian's version, and left a detailed and ALL CAPS-laced explanation at the talk page. I believe DerekHistorian and TrynaMakeADollar are running socks here on Wikipedia, and doing a really poor job at it.

Off-hand note: I wonder if these socks aren't related to WorldCreatorFighter.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WorldCreaterFighter -- Hunan201p (talk) 17:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC) @ST47:

Please do check if I'm a sock of DerekHistorian or a random IP address. I'm just dying to know as well. -TrynaMakeADollar (talk) 19:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

rant

You misinterpret authors words Lkhagvasuren (2016) with your own. Genghis Khan is 100% Mongoloid racially, physically. This is 100% fact. Even for your own PURPOSELY delusional misinterpreted words of the Lkhagvasuren 2016, there's no mention of him being caucasoid. This is what they said " This is based on Genghis Khan’s physical appearance, which exhibited some features of Caucasoid ethnic groups ". " suggesting that the Genghis Khan’s male lineage had some Caucasoid-specific genetic features " Mongoloid 100% or predominant Mongoloid 90%, 10% Caucasian. So even in that 2016 study he is basically Mongoloid and this only one author suggestion. Every evidence points him as Mongoloid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.7.235 (talk) 18:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC) So his father side may have some caucasoid genetics 20-21% but his father is still predominant Mongoloid 78-80% -and mother Mongoloid 100%, Genghis Khan 90% Mongoloid. Your from a ethnic group nobody cares about. Genghis Khan will always be 100% Mongoloid and always. 1 Mongolian is worth more 1 trillion of your ethnic group because ethnic group is good for nothing and bring 0% pride to the Asian race because nobody cares your Zhuang and Miao ethnic groups. Your obviously from the province of Hunan. You're 7-8 years too late with wikipedia ( way too late to revert everything) Since you like reverting pages. Why didn't you done sooner ? You have many boring years to catch up and too damn late. WHY NOW ?.Reverting the descent of Genghis :Khan R1b haplogroup page is so pointless, all of them being mentioned all five bodies were Mongoloid have been viewed more than 759,484 times since 2016 Go ahead and watch the page views. https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Descent_from_Genghis_Khan Central Asia section of interracial marriage. Mongol invasion genocide of Central Asian Iranian have been viewed more than 1,464,197 times (and this is only from 2015 July, page dates back 2012) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interracial_marriage&diff=672721179&oldid=672679566#Central_Asia https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&start=2015-07-01&end=2020-02-07&pages=Interracial_marriage Nobody can stop me anyway I can always use 50 different local computer shops, or contact other people. I can easily make a mess of wikipedia but now they even locked the talk page. I though at least the talk page anyone can write what they want, be it trolls, socks, and everyone else but it seems like now I have to be the way I am. I LIKE THIS WAY BETTER. Who care about wikipedia. Even Youtube videos has more views. There many youtube views, quora comments from 450,000 to 5,645,034 million youtube views that supports haplogroup N1c is Mongoloid. And that Central Asia Iranian was changed by Mongoloid invaders of Turkic and Mongol invasion , you can 6 videos of it from 190,050 views to 650,453 views. There are thousand videos of these. Heck even a lucky comment from Quora from one day get 5,000 to 19,000 views a day. Heck even Eupedia a genetic forum, the most popular genetic forum in the world claims haplogroup N is Mongoloid/East Asian origin. Every anthropology, geneticist claims haplogroup N is Mongoloid, east eurasian Mongoloid. Nobody claims anything else. You can look at any genetic study. NOT ONE CLAIM ANYTHING ELSE BUT ORIGINS WITH EAST ASIANS, SOUTH CHINA, MONGOLOID, EAST EURASIANS.

@EvergreenFir:@ST47: Please see the above comment by DerekHistorian, almost certainly a sock of WorldCreatorFighter. -- Hunan201p (talk) 00:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you think they're a sock of that user in particular, but if you have any hard evidence, you're welcome to submit it at WP:SPI. We would need diffs showing this user behaving in a similar way to previously confirmed sockpuppets. ST47 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)