Hlmcmahon
Welcome
editHello, Hlmcmahon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Chzz (talk) 00:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Feedback
editI have responded to your request for feedback, here.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Chzz at 00:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC).
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on BIOCOM Contract Research Organization (CRO) Initiative, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MJ94 (talk) 23:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from BIOCOM Contract Research Organization (CRO) Initiative, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Alex2564 (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with BIOCOM Contract Research Organization (CRO) Initiative. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Alex2564 (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BIOCOM.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Unblock request | Account misidentified as a sockpuppet
edit
Hlmcmahon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just saw a notification that my account has been identified as a sock puppet of Morning277 and therefore been blocked for allegedly abusing multiple accounts. My account has been misidentified and I would like to request that it be unblocked. "hlmcmahon" is a combination of my first and middle initials and my last name. It is also the prefix for the gmail address I have had for several years. This is my personal Wikipedia account and I am not sure why it would be considered otherwise. I have read through multiple pages related to this block and still cannot understand why this has happened. I looked through Morning277's contributions and did not see any similar edits. I also looked through the IP addresses listed for the Morning277 account and none of them match mine. I would be happy to provide additional proof of this mistake, I'm just not sure what is needed without knowing why these accounts were incorrectly linked. Please help. Hlmcmahon (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)hlmcmahon
Decline reason:
I have to agree with Dennis Brown. Your edits are strikingly in line with the Morning277 paid editing group, so much so that it's impossible for me to discount that you are editing as a proxy in order for Morning277 to circumvent their block. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:22, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Have you ever accepted payment in exchange for writing or uploading an article to Wikipedia? Someguy1221 (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
No, never. Hlmcmahon (talk) 16:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)hlmcmahon
- Being paid to write an article is not the issue, paid editing is within policy. The issue is Morning277 using multiple people to bypass policy. I've replied to one reviewing admin already and won't provide that evidence here, but suffice it to say that WilliamH thought he was a sock, and I think he is a sock, and my opinion hasn't changed. This doesn't mean he is the same person as Morning277, just that he works for them and is acting on their behalf, as clearly evidenced in the deleted contribs. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 15:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)