User talk:HighKing/Archives/2020/April
Latest comment: 4 years ago by HighKing in topic April 2020
This is an archive of past discussions about User:HighKing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
For your tireless work fighting corporate spam at AfD. I appreciate the time you put in producing your in-depth analysis of sources. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC) |
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --GRIPK (talk) 13:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC) - blocked as sock. --KartikeyaS (talk) 08:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The No Spam Barnstar | |
You definitely deserve more. Glad to have you as a co-editor here. Thank you very much! KartikeyaS (talk) 08:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC) |
Deletion review for Gospel Music Association
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Gospel Music Association. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Toa Nidhiki05 13:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- And we cannot ban people from !voting speedy anything any more than we can ban editors for !voting without doing the necessary research. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- :-) I know, I was tempted to out-superlative them though. Maybe !vote ULTRASPEEDY or IMMEDIATE or something? :-) HighKing++ 13:42, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
- changing the wording to be more inclusive is not a revert. I suggest you reread Wikipedia:Assume good faith.Grmike (talk) 22:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)grmike
- Changing the text to include a statement which is not supported by any of the references you added is original research. BLP articles are strict on what you can and cannot say. HighKing++ 11:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- [this Wikipedia article] all that show is that they have a residence in london. not the or the only. I have added proof to the article that they in fact have residences in canada, and sometimes do base themselves in Canada. I added canadian locations to existing residences not in place of them. Toronto-based is used a number of times in sources I found so I have no problem listing them alongside your UK residence. The inconsistenies between sources could mean that they do not have an "official" residence. so I carefully worded the lede to be more inclusive. Grmike (talk) 01:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)grmike
- Again, you must be careful not to synthesise meanings that are not directly supported by references. For example, an article on various businesses which includes a description of "Toronto-based Galen Weston" does *not* necessarily mean that he has a residence in Toronto as it *could* be referring to his businesses. That said, the Forbes reference is good and next time please support your additions with references that clearly say the same thing. HighKing++ 11:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)