User talk:Hersfold/Archive 71 (November 2012)
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| ← Previous archive - Archive 71 (November 2012) - Next archive → |
This page contains discussions dated during the month of November 2012 from User talk:Hersfold. Please direct all current discussions there. Thank you.
poorly done
Awarding a barnstar to an admin for taunting a recently blocked user just stripped off the rollback privilege? I'm sure it wasn't "humorous" to the target of the invective, and I'm certainly not seeing any humor myself. Admin actions should act to improve the encyclopedia. What lesson will the blocked user learn from Ks0stm's actions? How do you think he's going to feel toward Wikipedia in general and administrators specifically? Seeing the taunting from an immature admin is one thing, but having a member of the Arbitration Committee endorse it is highly disappointing. Nobody Ent 23:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- I explained my reasoning further down on Ks0stm's page. While I can understand how it would be seen another way, I recognize that taunting was not his intention and thought that his attempt to diffuse the situation had merit, even if it proved ineffective. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
I had reason to warn the above user for vandalism and noticed that no-one had welcomed them yet. Since you are rather good at that sort of thing, I thought you may like to know. regards Op47 (talk) 21:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:49, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Heron Bommie SVII.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Julia\talk 19:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
|
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 12:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 04:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
CRM system for the Arb mailing lists
You mentioned plans for a CRM system for the Arb mailing lists. Do you know if the system will prevent a reader from copy and pasting the contents of an email they can read? If it simply records forwards, it would be too easy to circumvent if copy-paste is allowed. I know my company had such a system, I thought it would be easy to circumvent with a screen shot, but that was disabled, although I suspect a real savvy person could find a way around it. (At a minimum I guess an external camera couldn't be prevented.) That said, I haven't seen it used for a couple years, so not sure whether it was dropped because it had vulnerabilities, or not used for some other reason.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- "However, no system we use will be able to prevent the copying and pasting or simple transcription of information, which does seem to be what happened here." It would appear the new system will not have those protections. MBisanz talk 17:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response (and apologies for missing that my question was answered in the original; I followed the link, and failed to read the end of the post). I hope the choice will be determined on other factors, as the security aspect seems to be nonexistent. I understand nothing can prevent transcription, but in my own case, that would be an effective bar for anything longer than a sentence :) --SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Very belated thank you
I was doing some research on some socks and stumbled upon this from 2008. I was not very active then so I must have missed your arbcom Q&A at that time. I am impressed that you were able to decode two events that happened pretty much before your time as shown in the second section under "Questions regarding ArbCom issues", #14. Thank you. You summed it up well.--MONGO 03:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution volunteer survey
 Dispute Resolution – Volunteer Survey Invite Hello Hersfold. To follow up on the first survey in April, I am conducting a second survey to learn more about dispute resolution volunteers - their motivations for resolving disputes, the experiences they've had, and their ideas for the future. I would appreciate your thoughts. I hope that with the results of this survey, we will learn how to increase the amount of active, engaged volunteers, and further improve dispute resolution processes. The survey takes around five to ten minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have either listed yourself as a volunteer at a dispute resolution forum, or are a member of a dispute resolution committee. For more information, please see the page that describes my fellowship work which can be found here. Szhang (WMF) (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
 Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 2443 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|