HarpsBoy

John Fullerton

Stop posting hoax articles. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

As it says right above these sentences, your "John Fullerton" article. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, HarpsBoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Catchpole 22:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD notification

Some articles you created have been nominated for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloka Asokuh. Oldelpaso 23:10, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello HarpsBoy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 698 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Matthew Crossan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Fergal Harkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Crossan

The article Matthew Crossan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE as the Irish leagues are not fully professional. Also fails notability and verifiability due to lack of sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- BigDom 12:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Eloka Asokuh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eloka Asokuh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloka Asokuh (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Eloka Asokuh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eloka Asokuh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloka Asokuh (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 21:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)