{{hangon}} The subject is a well known achiever in his field of UK immigration law having featured on all forms of media as an expert from sky news to the BBC. He is a qualified solicitor with his own Tv show and radio show on the BBC watched and listened to by thousands. the A7 criterion of the subject being of no importance or notability clearly does not apply as the subject is obviously important to various media outlets. The article was only edited due to the fact that it was incorrect in that previously it was edited by somebody to say the subject was a legal assistant whereas the subject is a solicitor. All points in the article are referenced with links to press articles and videos.Harjapbhangal (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Harjap Singh Bhangal

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Harjap Singh Bhangal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jasgrider 14:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest

edit

  If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 03:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

The article Legal Solution has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Desho Pardesh

edit
 

The article Desho Pardesh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Baharan Punjab Diyan

edit
 

The article Baharan Punjab Diyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest revisited

edit

Hi. You were informed of our conflict of interest guideline > 5 years ago, but you continue to edit your own biography. Please knock it off. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 21:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)Reply