Happysaddy

June 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. An edit that you recently made to Shades of Blue (TV series) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 20:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Crowded (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diffs: [1][2] Future events must be sourced per WP:CRYSTAL. Without references it appears you're manufacturing content, which may not be your intention. Please note that per WP:BURDEN, when content you submit has been challenged and a reference is requested, the onus is on you to provide that reference, not resubmit the unsourced content. Resubmitting unsourced content is disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Slap (U.S. miniseries). Optakeover^(Talk) 15:32, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:34, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Diffs: [3][4] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —Darkwind (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Odd Mom Out

Hello. It is not okay to add information/revert edits without any explanation. The material you are trying to add to Odd Mom Out is not mentioned in the press releases and seems to be false which would be considered vandalism. Mymis (talk) 22:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Indefinite block

It has become apparent that you are not genuinely interested in improving Wikipedia, because your disruptive editing of inserting/changing content without providing sources has resumed immediately after your block expired. Therefore,

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

—Darkwind (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happysaddy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

it's been 2 years, i'm am ready for a second chance and i am not a sock puppet Happysaddy (talk) 19:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Given the timing, content, naming, behavior and technical matches, I simply do not believe you. Please use your original account to request a second chance. Kuru (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Interesting that you return to this 2-year old account the day after I block your latest sock and rangeblock your IPs...--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happysaddy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please Jezebel's Ponyo you have to set me free after a 2 year block by DarkLord it's time to do it right now

Decline reason:

As you were told above, you can use your original account to request an unblock. Huon (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.