Speedy deletion of Bankalization

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Bankalization requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BustOut (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bankalisation. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.

July 2008

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bankalisation. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. AvnjayTalk 10:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bankalisation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AvnjayTalk 10:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bankalisation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AvnjayTalk 10:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Lradrama 11:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Handrinos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I never participated in any wikipedia discussion plus I do not know this user who blocked me

Decline reason:

Both of those statements are true. You did not participate in the discussions above, and there is no expectation that you would know the administrator who blocked you. You were blocked for adding an article on self-invented term, then edit warring to remove the deletion tag. That being said, this was five years ago, and a simple pledge to avoid the same behavior would likely lead to a quick unblock. Kuru (talk) 23:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the discussion that ensued prior to your being blocked (five and a half years ago.) --jpgordon::==( o ) 18:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

For completeness, I've also restored the 8 revisions deleted at 00:44, 3 August 2008. They can now be seen in the page history. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 12:34, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Handrinos (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to apologise for creating a definition (Bankalisation) without taking into consideration the wikipedia rules. I can assure you that this will not happen again. I did not take any action before as the system indicated that the definition would be deleted automatically.

Accept reason:

Considering the time that has passed since the original block, and the relatively minor nature of the infractions, I am willing to give another chance here. Please avoid creating articles like your original one, and we shouldn't have an issue here. Also, there was concern that your article was using yourself as a source...please don't edit in ways that suggest self promotion or a conflict of interest. only (talk) 10:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

These are just warnings that a page was there previously. If you're creating your user page, then just move forward and create it by using the entry box below that warning. If you're trying to re-create the "Bankalization" page, the warning notes that it was deleted through a community-driven process, and that you should read that discussion before re-creating the article. Kuru (talk) 15:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Handrinos. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 12:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

edit
 
Hello! Handrinos, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 13:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply