H tan H epi tas

In response to your feedback

Unfortunately, deletionists often have a "shoot first, ask question later" mentality when it comes to new editors. If you want to talk to nice editors, you could check out the teahouse.

David¹²¹⁷ 00:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Assam#etymology dispute resolution

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Assam#Etymology". Thank you. --Chaipau (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback

It's sad to hear that. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you ever needed any help. Also, here are some pages that might help you get started:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Salma Vian (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

 

In response to your feedback

Hi, it's sad to hear that, can you please redirect me to the article you edited and the prove of you being called fraudster on my talk page. I'm sorry for your bad experiences.

Webclient101 (talk) 00:35, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Response to your comment on my talk page

Hi, I looked at the Assam talk page and I saw the User:bbhagawati as you said accused you of being a "fraudster" and "bias". I can see he was irritated about your opinion and you were shocked and appalled at what he or she said. But currently it seems he does not have a account with Wikipedia anymore. Do you know what happened to his account?

Hi again, if his new account has not been active for the Assam talk page, you shouldn't worry. Remember this is Wikipedia, everybody's opinion matters. Don't let a bizarre user stop you from making a good, unbiased opinion. If this happens again you should really contact a admin, for the user was attacking you. Thanks for editing Wikipedia, If you have any problems or questions, please feel free to drop it in talk page. Have a great day! (:

Webclient101 (talk) 19:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Assam Etymology 2

I have submitted the issue here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Assam.23Etymology. Thanks for your interest and help. Chaipau (talk) 11:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Are you my Sockpuppet?

You have been accused of being my sockpuppet, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Chaipau. Chaipau (talk) 00:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Use of Threat to Resolve Dispute

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard regarding Use of Threat to Resolve Dispute. The thread is "Use of Threat to Resolve Dispute".The discussion is about the topic Use of Threat to Resolve Dispute. Thank you. ([1]) --130.65.109.101 (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

A note on the sockpuppet investigation

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that a previously uninvolved administrator has also said that the sockpuppet investigation against you is "utterly without merit" [2]. That being said, there is a small group of administrators who normally close SPIs, and it routinely takes several days for these investigations to be closed due to the backlog. I have not assessed your other actions on Wikipedia (e.g., what you might have done to make this person upset with you), and I don't wish to get involved with that, but as far as sockpuppetry is concerned, I think you have nothing to worry about. This IP user is not getting any brownie points for making frivolous accusations against you at AN, either. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:35, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the update. I have no idea why the IP is upset with me. We've never talked before. All of a sudden, 3 months after I offered the Third Opinion on Assam Etymology, I get a message that I got involved into an accusation for sockpuppetry and threats! Actually, I think that there is a group of people upset with User:Chaipau because they don't agree with his views on Assam. When I offered a completely unbiased Third Opinion for the Assam Etymology section, I had not realised that it was such a sensitive issue by a minority group. I judged purely on scientific criteria, i.e. the content, the sources, the arguments and unbiased info I found online. I have no conflict of interest and I don't even live in the same continent. I do agree with User:Chaipau that the IP is somebody else's sockpuppet. User:Kurmaa is very offensive, has been blocked in the past, and the IP style resembles his/her. Wikipedia is not and should not be a place for people full of hatred like this. --H tan H epi tas (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)