Guesswho03721

I have moved the content of your recently created page Bobdownsite to your subpage and deleted that page. Please work on your userpage User:Guesswho03721/Bobdownsite2 to get the article ready for publication. The content you wrote was improperly formatted and unreadable as it was. It appears you were trying to use Template:Infobox mineral, but it was improperly formatted and appeared to be about apatite rather than bobdownsite. Please work on your userpage draft to get it right ... Feel free to ask me or some other user for help. Vsmith (talk) 03:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Correction - I've moved the content to Draft:User:Guesswho03721/Bobdownsite2 to preserve your edit history there. Please work on it and when ready for publication ask for help moving it to article space. Sorry about the confusion. Ask me for help. Vsmith (talk) 03:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bobdownsite (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Guesswho03721/Bobdownsite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Guesswho03721/Bobdownsite

Hello, Guesswho03721. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bobdownsite".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 14:20, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bobdownsite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bobdownsite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobdownsite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kent G. Budge (talk) 15:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)