March 2013Edit

  Hello, I'm Elephantsandbacon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Historical powers without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! elphantsandbacon Care to talk? 16:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, Greekogreeko. You have new messages at Elephantsandbacon's talk page.
Message added 17:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

elphantsandbacon Care to talk? 17:40, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editsEdit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, Greekogreeko. You have new messages at Elephantsandbacon's talk page.
Message added 16:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

elphantsandbacon Care to talk? 16:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Saxon - Iranian LanguagesEdit

Hello, I just deleted the content you added to the Saxons article. The "Iranian Languages" section looks too much like a hoax and I can't find any evidence that either of the references is real. If I'm wrong, please let me know and refer me to sources that I can check. I hope I'm wrong and that I owe you an apology. SchreiberBike (talk) 03:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi and thank you for your msssge. no it is not a hoax, It is true and the sources are true too. My Subject had many parts which is your problem? If you can not find sources it does not mean it is false or hoax


the tribes' names In Avesta=Edit

Notice: many sources are in another language (and it was about another language) and i try to give you a link for them:

Avesta: the Farvardin Yashts of the young Avesta

http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/languages/

http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%86%E2%80%8C%DB%8C%D8%B4%D8%AA

The Avesta contains the names of various tribal groups who lived in proximity to each other. According to Prof. Gherardo Gnoli:’’Iranian tribes that also keep on recurring in the Yasht, Airyas, Tuiryas, Sairimas, Sainus and Dahis’’.[12] In the hymns of the Avesta, the adjective Tūrya is attached to various enemies of Zoroastrism like Fraŋrasyan (Shahnameh: Afrāsīāb). The word occurs only once in the Gathas, but 20 times in the later parts of the Avesta.

a b G. Gnoli, Zoroaster's time and homeland, Naples 1980 M. Boyce, History of Zoroastrianism. 3V. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1991. (Handbuch Der Orientalistik/B. Spuler)

Sagxni/Sagxoni or Sagsi or Saka.Edit

Saka is available in Wikipedia

for Sagxi/Sagxoni/Sagsi (سگزی) you can read :

http://www.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/far/hobbies/iran/Shahnameh/shahnameh_ch16.html

you can read the story of Esfandiyār & Rostam or you can see this persian source: http://ganjoor.net/index.php?s=%D8%B3%DA%AF%D8%B2%DB%8C&author=4

the tableEdit

The Interpretation of Avesta,by Prof. Freydun Joneydi, 1965 not available online or The Perso-European Languages, Prof. Noxostin, Paris, 1906 but:

http://www.loghatnaameh.org/dehkhodaworddetail-f05d06f718054d64ad2ad78b58a0eeac-fa.html

you can use this link : http://fa.glosbe.com/fa/ae/

Hello, Greekogreeko. You have new messages at SchreiberBike's talk page.
Message added 07:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, I've moved the discussion to the talk page for the relevant article here. Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 18:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

No original researchEdit

Please stop inserting original research [1][2], personal essays [3], and dubious/unsourced claims [4] to articles. This kind of editing is disruptive. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your original research. Thank you. --Omnipaedista (talk) 12:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)