February 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Xexerss. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hunter × Hunter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 06:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Touch (manga), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hunter × Hunter, you may be blocked from editing. Xexerss (talk) 07:09, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter × Hunter. Xexerss (talk) 10:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Verifiability is a core Wikipedia policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of best-selling manga, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of best-selling manga, you may be blocked from editing. Xexerss (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of best-selling manga. Xexerss (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns about verifiability issues voiced here on this page.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

. edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandmangojoy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was foolish to edit unreliable sources. But now I will only add reliable sources. So can you unblock my account please? Grandmangojoy (talk) 07:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please give three specific example sources for edits you have already made this month. This will demonstrate you understand WP:RS. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandmangojoy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I edited Joseon, YuYu Haksho, Captain tsubasa with reliable sources, Grandmangojoy (talk) 11:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Grandmangojoy (talk) 11:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Two of those articles don't even exist. And using your prior edits as examples won't work. Your prior edits were inappropriate. You need to give new sources that you'd use to properly cite edits you made in the past, now that you understand the verifiability concerns raised here. Your prior edits were bad, we are looking to make sure you understand that and would edit differently in the future. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandmangojoy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So what should I do if my prior edits doesn’t work? Grandmangojoy (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't do this. You already have an open unblock request. No need (and indeed, it's abusive) to make another. Demonstrate you understand why your earlier edits were inappropriate by showing proper reliable, verifiable sources for edits you previously made. You can do so here. If your contention is that your prior edits were correct, we'll have to leave the block in place. --Yamla (talk) 12:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grandmangojoy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So now I can’t edit anymore forever? Grandmangojoy (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

And neither is this. Please do not use unblock requests to ask questions. If you continue to do this, you'll just lose the ability to make further unblock requests. If you don't know what to put in an unblock request, read the guide. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:31, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Grandmangojoy (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

STOP IT. Stop making new unblock requests when you already have one open. If you are unable to follow the instructions above, it would be inappropriate to unblock you. So, either follow the instructions and hope to be unblocked or don't, and expect the block will be left in place. It's your call. I will not respond further (except to continue removing further abuses of the unblock template). --Yamla (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see zero hope for an unblock to happen at the moment, especially if the lack of response to the concerns voiced by other users isn't addressed as well. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2023 (UTC)Reply