Goo Figure

Nomination of People News Chronicle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article People News Chronicle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/People News Chronicle (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PQR01 (talk) 00:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page.

Kuru (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Goo Figure (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think you are misunderstanding. Really, why think I mean something then you go ahead to use it as a reason to block me? I am finding references in the background, this is supposed to be very simple to understand. Or do you think I should call you to a meeting so that we can discuss how to find references? Well maybe that one won't be "in the background". By background (well because you don't misunderstand or deliberately choose to because your agenda must agend), I meant I am working on it without you guys knowing. Even if you see the page is silent after comments, it means I am working on making it better silently IN THE BACKGROUND. Now, in your wild misconstrued senses, it tells you "Uhm, background means this guy is going to make a 5h phone call to site owner to determine what to do". You are damn damn damn wrong mate! I am doing my own fucking research. And please try to get this. It has been almost a week now and I would really like to make things right. Every single edit I make follows a complaint from someone.

Decline reason:

This does not convince me that you will make constructive contrbutions. It might help if you described a contribution you would like to make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're desperately trying to promote a junk SEO blog pretending to be a news outlet. If you're not able to see that from what other editors are trying to point out to you, then you lack the competency to edit here. As you've continued to use fake sources to add more obviously incorrect material, I've disabled this account. Kuru (talk) 05:12, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I understand your motive to block me. I promise not to make any new changes to the article unless it is verified as not junk. I am sorry that I made the mistake, I won't repeat it. I know what good sources look like but there is a problem, this news site has very few references to support yet it is an established site with significant coverage. Unfortunately, it is just covered by fellow tabloids. I am truly sorry and I am still trying to make the page better but you have my word: I won't make a change unless I strongly believe it is worth doing it. Please re-enable my account. Thanks. Goo Figure (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Goo Figure/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Goo Figure/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. casualdejekyll 18:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)