December 2021

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Steaua București, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 22:43, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steaua București. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 10:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Steaua București, you may be blocked from editing. The Banner talk 11:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Steaua București. The Banner talk 13:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

FYI

edit

I have requested a sockpuppet investigation here:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Goalandgoal. The Banner talk 15:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Goalandgoal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 16:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
To be clear: creating a new account to avoid scrutiny while engaging in edit warring is unacceptable. I have no view on the content you have been in disagreement about, but if you abuse multiple accounts again your next block will likely be indefinite. Girth Summit (blether) 16:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 01:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

FYI 2

edit

I have filed a second sockpuppet investigation against you: see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Goalandgoal#09_May_2022. The Banner talk 12:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Goalandgoal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 18:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)Reply