August 2017

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Giovanni Sacheli. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Politrukki (talk) 11:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Giovannisacheli. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Giovanni Sacheli, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Politrukki (talk) 11:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello thank you

edit

Hello, I don't understand why the page continues to be proposed for deletion. It has fine information and all the related linked info are real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giovannisacheli (talkcontribs) 11:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you think that Giovanni Sacheli should not be deleted, please voice your opinion in the deletion discussion (I won't go into details but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Proposed deletion are slightly different processes). If the consensus among Wikipedia editors in the deletion discussion is that the subject is not notable, I'm afraid the article will be deleted.
In order to save the article from deletion you (or any editor) must be able to demonstrate that the subject (I assume that's you) has received significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. For example if a respectable newspaper/journal/magazine/etc. publishes an interview of you or cites you as an expert, that's one instance of secondary coverage that can be cited as evidence of notability. If you are only briefly mentioned in a list, that's less likely to be compelling evidence of notability. If you are mentioned in a conference program or something like that, it's likely that the source is not considered as an independent reliable source.
Please note that even though sources used in English Wikipedia don't have to be written in English, most editors here don't understand Italian, which means that they are unable find evidence of notability even if such evidence exists. If you can provide more secondary sources or if you are able to explain how the sources currently cited in the article contribute to notability, please do so in the deletion discussion.
Hope this helps. Politrukki (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I will try to discuss with other editors because I really can't unserstand the reasons behind this deletion. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giovannisacheli (talkcontribs)