Gekhoor

Recent edits to Michael van Gerwen

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Michael van Gerwen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! _{Adotchar| reply here} 00:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Michael van gerwen

Hi could you stop editing van gerwen's page you are clearly doing harmful edits. These events are clearly stated as pdc majors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.143.142 (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

What are you doing ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.200.176.107 (talk) 23:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing content on Michael van Gerwen's article. Mórtas is Dóchas (talk) 19:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Michael van Gerwen. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a blockage. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael van Gerwen. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wolbo (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gekhoor reported by User:Wolbo (Result: ). Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Can we get this person barred for vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.196.223 (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Michael van Gerwen. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Michael van Gerwen. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)