Welcome to Wikipedia! edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know -- and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Also, I saw the two articles you uploaded -- Siquitibum and Chiquitibum. Where you have two words for the same thing, you don't have to write and upload two articles -- you can write one article for one term, then use a "redirect" page for the other term. See Help:Redirect for more information.

Once again welcome to Wikipedia,

--A. B. 00:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Notification edit

A tag has been placed on Simple Dreams, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Theunicyclegirl 22:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your message to Theunicyclegirl edit

That message wan't very nice. --Cremepuff222 (talk, sign book) 23:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Echo Park, Los Angeles, California, you will be blocked from editing Prairie Dog 06:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yo, Doggie boy edit

Yo Doggie, how did I vandalize the Echo Park entry? By editing out BS/fantasy yuppie nincompoop entries? I have contributed more factual info to Echo Park, Silverlake, Highland Park, Los Feliz, Elysian Valley, Elysian Heights than most anyone else, doggie boy. If you want to write fantasy, do what yuppies do and write a script...or go bar-hopping!

Garagehero 08:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)garageheroReply

October 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Islam in the African Diaspora. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 00:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 08:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: RE: My message to unicyclegirl edit

Heh, I think it was this one. Looking back, I suppose it isn't that bad... So my apologies. *Cremepuff222* 14:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

January 2008 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Lasse Virén. Thank you. Prolog (talk) 05:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2008 edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lasse Virén. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Prolog (talk) 09:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply



Yo Pro edit

Yes yes...I'm a bad boy for telling the truth about the cheater who passes himself off as a hero. It seems you Finns are the only people in the world that dont know that the cat is out of the bag, and has been for the last 20 years when the persons involved came forth and confessed. Too bad they cannot take his medals away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garagehero (talkcontribs)

If you consider telling The Truth more important than verifiability, neutrality and BLP, Wikipedia is not for you. Prolog (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nor is it a forum for fairy tales about cheaters who were caught cheating and never again performed at the same level after blood-doping was outlawed. LOL!!!

Garagehero (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2008 (UTC)garageheroReply


Okay Mr. Prolog...I wont again disturb your altar to Viren. I will follow the rules. I just wanted to make a point...(a point,sort of like your cabeza.) 22:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)garagehero

May 2008 edit

Warning regarding your edits to Kenneth Rexroth. edit

  This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --- RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 20:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Babe Ruth edit

Hi, I see you recently added an entry stating that he maintained an apartment in Los Angeles, California. Do you have a source for this unverified information? Please cite the source, before adding it to the article. As others have previously advised, verifiability is required.  JGHowes  talk 14:34, 13 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for your informative email. Too bad those bats you salvaged weren't autographed by the Babe – they'd be worth a fortune now. Just one reference about his LA abode would suffice for a non-controversial matter, such as the LA Times article you have. By the way, Ruth also had a beach cottage in Treasure Island, Florida (near St. Petersburg, where the Yankees used to train). The house still stands (I've photographed it).  JGHowes  talk 00:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Alton2.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Alton2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


File source problem with File:Alton1.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Alton1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Logged-out vandalism edit

It seems you still have not stopped the vandalism and BLP violations, but are merely logging out to do it. Am I correct? This account, along with your IP, can both be blocked for a very long time if you continue. Prolog (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I dont know what you are talking about. I have never heard of you.Garagehero (talk) 22:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It seems that you have not tried to hide the connection before, so please do not insult my intelligence by starting now. Your IP is currently blocked for a week and the block applies to your user account as well. Try to contribute constructively and only constructively once the block expires. Prolog (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am not trying to insult your intelligence, dear sir. For me to do that, I would have to find your "intelligence". Should I go to the expense of hiring a private detective to look for it? Perhaps I can convince the neighborhood children to look for it...they are good at finding things. Once , they found a human bone, quite old, Red Indian perhaps, down by the river bank. I dont know. I am confused. But I tell you what....if I find your "intelligence", I will give it a glass of milk and some kookies, ooops, I meant , cookies, and I will then proceed to insult it, but only mildy, for you seem to be a quite nervous, excitable fellow. Ha ha....but seriously, as for contributing "constructively", I have written world class articles on here, only to find them hacked to pieces and reworded and rewritten by hacks, fans, or moderators/administrators with little or no writing skills, so as to be easily understandable by a person of the third grade( elementary). It seems , however, that the admins/editors are the worse. Many are tortured souls, fully grown adults, who are still living in their parent's basement and bitter because they couldn't get a real publishing job, or more than likely, have never come to terms with the real world, so they create their own little worlds where they become experts at revisionist history. Over-zealous Admins on power-trips, editors and moderators who are bitter failed professionals have quickly made Wikipedia the joke of the internet. Garagehero (talk) 09:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


File permission problem with File:Altonwhitepromo1.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Altonwhitepromo1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 19:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Altonwhitepromo1.jpg.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Altonwhitepromo1.jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:36, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Garagehero. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply