Gamachuiaaa

Gamachuiaaa, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gamachuiaaa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

False accusations

Mr editor

Just see how you removed the sources of California University without giving any reasons. I am not removing anything, I have just added the source there. RS6784 (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

According to the Archaeological Survey of India, Alha Udal belonged to the Ahir caste. Gamachuiaaa (talk) 11:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Udal of Mahoba have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Udal of Mahoba was changed by Gamachuiaaa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883507 on 2021-09-12T11:00:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 22:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Pls don't revert or edit anything without starting debate on talk page

You are constantly doing disruptive editing on various pages without giving any reasons on talk page. RS6784 (talk) 08:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Community sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 21:25, 18 September 2021 (UTC)