Welcome!

edit

Hello, GUMBALL2004, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bisbis (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

January 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghostin (Grande song)

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ghostin (Grande song), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 21:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2019

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Next restoration of edits that have been reverted will result in you being reported to an administrator. Ss112 13:53, 14 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande discography, you may be blocked from editing. I just said to leave the note in otherwise we will have more IPs changing the peak from 12 to 10 because they think the Japanese chart on the discography is for Billboard's Japanese chart. You yourself reverted an IP who did this, so you know it could be a problem. Leave it as it is. Ss112 18:17, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your WP:OWN edits to Ariana Grande discography

edit

Your edits to Ariana Grande discography are getting to the point of WP:OWN. You are behaving as if you own this article; every decision or addition to it appears to have to meet your approval or you indirectly revert it when you return to it. You are making unexplained or barely explained choices that you are think for the benefit of the article but aren't. What is the point of repeating a reference seven more times than is necessary when it was fine once at the top of the column? There is none. It is better to have the one reference at the top and remove it later. Please stop with this baffling behaviour. Ss112 18:46, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Don't revert people without explanation. You've already been reported to an administrator. Ss112 20:11, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GUMBALL2004 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here GUMBALL2004 (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)I don't think I should be blocked because I reverted someone who made unconstructive edits, like adding France and Germany to the charts. Also, I only tried something on the page and I forgot to undone it. Sorry. And yes, I know I did a mistake. I promise it will never happen again, if I am unblocked. Also, why am I conisdered a sockpuppet? I saw that when I looked on the user you blocked, Bbb23 and when I checked my username, I saw category of sockpuppets of December or something like that. I don't know what link I have with that user.Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.