Im a new user to the whole Wikipedia, and im pretty dang sure i love it.
Wikipedia is more then i have dreamed of. You see, all my life i have wanted to gain knowledge, and wikipedia is the most knowledge filled website i have ever seen, heard of, heard, tasted, whatever! Its freaking huge!!!
no lieIamageniusseriously 23:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
I am sure i will love to use this site for my resource whenever i wish to learn anything i need, so if you have anything to say, any comments, questions, or if you just want to say hi, post a chat.GENIUS(4th power) (talk) 02:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Place the following code around the words you want to make super- or sub-script: <sup></sup> for Superscript, <sub></sub> for supscript. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
There are also two buttons on your editing toolbar that will help you do this, and . Hersfold(t/a/c) 23:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
{{help me|i know, i already tried using those and they didnt work as you can see on the top of my talk and user page, those are failed attempts even tho i followed wat you said to do... here goes another try. <hello></Iamagenius>}}
You got it at the end there - anything in superscript has to be inside <sup> tags - for example, Superscriptsubscript. See this page for more help with Wikimarkup. Hersfold(t/a/c) 23:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Thanks for uploading Image:Iroh.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
{{helpme}}Go to "my preferences" and on the "Signature" field, design your signature with the box "Raw signature" checked. Later, try signing your name with ~~~~. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Lord Voldemort, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Emma Watson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 00:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
???? what did i vandalize? What did i do? I didnt delete information, nor did i use slang or harmful words. All i did was write a reference to a video made about her on Youtube and then i got a warning for vandalizing by Esanchez, then i got blocked 5 minutes later??? What did i do?
Decline reason:
You were using articles as a place to discuss the subject of the articles. Wikipedia is not a forum, and our articles are intended to provide only encyclopedic information. Providing instructions on how you managed to avoid your school's site filter ([1]) is not acceptable, nor is promoting your Youtube videos ([2]). Please review our guidelines, and make constructive edits after your block. Thank you. — Hersfold(t/a/c) 01:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{help me|why do people keep saying that i am vandalizing pages when i am 1. not deleting information, 2. only adding helpful information, and 3. Being nice and adding my sig and references to all the pages i edit. Seriously, what did i do wrong? Heres a reference page to one of the pages i supposidly "vandalized" Emma Watson (under Future)}}
That added no helpful content and was removed. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 00:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
{{help me|so, if it added no helpful content, howcome i am blocked for 3 days then?}}
Please see the unblock decline message above, and please also do not use the helpme template in an attempt to get unblocked. Thank you. — Hersfold(t/a/c) 01:55, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
You can link to a sound file as you would an image, like this: [[Image:Example.ogg]] - that code produces the player at right. However, there isn't much music on Wikipedia because most music is copyrighted, and even if you do find a sample clip you like, our non-free content policy prohibits anyone from using copyrighted material on user pages. So please don't embed music on your page. Hersfold(t/a/c) 01:49, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you mean that you want the talk page link directly over the contribs link, in one column, you can't. The third or fourth signature you have below are the best you can do.--Werdan7T@ 02:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Help pls, i dont have a contributions page?! whenever i try to link to it it says page doesnt exist.
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Galvanotropism, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 03:17, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
A tag has been placed on This (Part of Maze), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mr mark taylor (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry, Wikipedia isn't a place to play games. We're here to build an encyclopedia, and creating pages like that is disruptive. If you'd like people to talk to you, you may consider posting on their talk pages. If they don't respond here, they probably did on their talk page. Hersfold(t/a/c) 03:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Genius, I've been going through your contributions just now, and noticed that you have very few edits out side of your userspace, and most of those to articles are either test edits or vandalism. I'd like to remind you again that Wikipedia isn't MySpace or anywhere to play games, especially in the main namespace where we keep articles. Making edits to that effect is disruptive and could lead to a block, one of which you've already had. You should probably consider reading through some of our policies and guidelines, as they may help you better understand what Wikipedia is and what you can do to help improve it. This might also reduce the number of times you need to call for help with {{helpme}} as well. However, if your intention here is not to build an encyclopedia, which is Wikipedia's purpose, you may be at the wrong site. I'm sorry to put it that way, but your actions so far aren't showing that that's what you're here to do. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know on my talk page. Hersfold(t/a/c) 04:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'd like you to make some improvements to articles before I tell you. I don't mean to seem as though I'm blackmailing you or anything, but like I said, we're here to build an encyclopedia, not make a cool signature. You'll notice a lot of the more experienced users simply have a default signature. Let me know when you've made some improvements and I'll show you the code. Hersfold(t/a/c) 04:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Looking at the deletion log, it seems that several articles on several different topics have been created and subsequently deleted for various reasons at that title. At least one such article was about the video you mentioned; you can see the deletion discussion on it here. If you truly want to write an article on that, I'd suggest you do some considerable research into it, as the page is not likely to be unprotected unless you can demonstrate that you are able to write a fully fledged article that is capable of establishing notability for the video according to WP:WEB, as well as our numerousotherpolicies which will need to be closely followed for an article on such a controversial subject. This page may also be of considerable help. I'd suggest working on a draft article on a user subpage of yours, such as User:GENIUS(4th power)/Sandbox, so you can show administrators what you have ready when you go to request unprotection of the page.
Image source problem with Image:DeadlyShadows.jpgedit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:DeadlyShadows.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Image Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading Image:55.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
No. You can find a list of all special pages here. Note, however, that you are unlikely to get any barnstars until you start contributing to articles. Hersfold(t/a/c) 21:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
It takes up at least seven lines in an edit window. The length is unnecessary. Per WP:SIG, signatures are not to be excessively long. Nakon 01:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Please make some edits outside your userspace. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not make cool sigs and play with the WikiCode. Thanks, CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Make edits outside my userpage? I totally understand what you are saying, and i respect that. Only problem is i like to beef up my user page as well as make my signature the best it can be. I only just yesterday found the Sandbox tool (i couldnt find it before) so i shall be using that instead. I will try to edit Wikipedia instead of my own page instead though. Sorry for that.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please keep the discussion here. I recommend that you do something good for an article. Something like a copy-edit or infobax adding. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yep, im gonna start editing those pages. By the way, can you help me on making my talk page black background and red words? It was like that (i copy and pasted yours, then modified it to my liking) for a minute but then you sent me a message and it changed. Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GENIUS(4th power) (talk • contribs) 20:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Let's try bold. Keep the discussion here. Okay? Geez. And I removed the coloring because it broke the page. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
See that link to the right of Word of advice? The [Edit] one. Push it. There you go! CWii(Talk|Contribs) 22:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, your article was deleted because even the title says it's not appropriate for Wikipedia. Please see what Wikipedia is not. Also I'm not an admin :). CWii(Talk|Contribs) 22:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:55.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC) --CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, 2065:the end?, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
References? There was no references at all on the article? And also, it had no neutral point-of-view. You can remake it but if it has no purpose from what it has, then I would have to delete it. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
For this so-called "world destruction", use "me", "we", "I", and such. It's not about you. Ex.
"For years, i have heard from friends at school about the legend of "Armageddeon(i spelt it wrong, please correct)". "judgement Day", and "Doomsday", but have we ever heard when it was meant to happen? I have."
Those are your words. It's not essay you're writing with you in it. It's not suppose to have "I" in it. And sources? Good luck with that. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's not reliable. It's not POV but it's not reliable. Who's classmates? Yours. It's not gonna help the article. --Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 21:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
You may not have fair-use images in your userspace. Please do not re-add them. Nakon 18:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you continue to re-add the images, I will protect your userpage from editing. Nakon 18:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Nakon! Where is your userpage?
My userpage is linked in my signature. Nakon 18:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
No its not.
Since you insist on re-adding the image, I'll go ahead and delete it for being licensed incorrectly. You may not just upload media without properly citing where you downloaded the image from. Additionally, you may not have fair-use images in your userspace. Nakon 18:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Famousstarsandstraps.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 19:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
Blocked
You have been blocked for one week for continually ignoring requests to improve your conduct and edit in a constructive manner. You have been asked several times to make useful edits to articles, shorten your signature to meet guidelines, stop editing only in your userspace, stop uploading copyrighted images under false licenses and placing them on your userpage, but you have continued all of these activities despite several attempts to work with you. You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, providing a reason why you should be unblocked where indicated. Please note, however, that unless you can demonstrate a willingness and capability to actively help improve this project, you are unlikely to be unblocked. When your block expires or is lifted, please help improve the project rather than remaining here to play games. Hersfold(t/a/c) 20:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Endorse This block is justified. Genius you need to shape up. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:28, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
um, sorry, but i was following the conduct. I was not "continually ignoring requests", obviously becuase i asked Nakon about why he was doing that. To ignore something is to no care or notice it, whereas i did. Also, i only uploaded the images that were endorsed under an O.K'd copyright license, and the one that i uploaded without it was deleted and i was ok with that becuase i admit that i didnt have a proper copyright. Furthermore, I am not playing gamesfor the fifteenth time i am onl7y trying to understand why things are happening. Please unblock, i havent vandalised and i only "ignored" out of curiousity. At the lease, take away the week long block and replace with 2 days or sumthing. Sincerely, Genius.
Decline reason:
I'm turning down your request for an unblock. In my mind, you were lucky to get a week and not an endless block. Editing solely your own userpage, signature and other non-encyclopedia things is not constructive in the slightest. You claim you're "only trying to understand why things are happening" yet when told about said "things" you persist with doing them. You have contributed only 14 times to the mainspace, in comparison to your 154 times to user: and user talk: spaces. Users have been banned in the past for this. When the block expires, please try to edit articles instead of using Wikipedia as a MySpace. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 21:42, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I think that i finally understand why you guys keep getting mad at me for editing my own page alot. Yea, its because its wrong to just sit here and deck out my own page instead of contributing to Wikipedia. But, im curious, is it allrite though if i just on occasion make adjustments to my page? Because i see alot of the Admins on Wikipedia have very, very nice pages and very little blocks for that, if not none. But anyway, i do understand know what you meant by saying "its not Myspace". So, thank you, and i shall use this week to think about it.
Decline reason:
That is not a request to be unblocked. — Sandstein 22:05, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's not problematic for people to edit their userspace, but it does become a problem when the amount of edits there make it clear they're not here to contribute. You have less than 20 edits to articles, most of which could be considered at best unconstructive, several others vandalism. You've been asked several times to make useful edits outside of your user pages, and you have continued to do so. Wikipedia is not a game. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to screw around. Please do think about this, take a few looks through some of our policies, especially what Wikipedia is not, and come back after your block expires. Hersfold(t/a/c) 22:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, i just made an edit to the page Hu Jintao concerning the vice president(s). From the news i had as well as my newest encyclopedia, Wu Xiaoquing is the current vice president, so i added him in there in replacement to the other one. Just thought youd know.
Don't make the text colored please. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's a good thing you asked, because we already have an article at 2008 Sichuan earthquake. It was linked to off the Main Page for several weeks. In the future, do try searching for articles before looking to create them. Usually topics like this are covered almost instantly. Just so you know, I am on vacation right now, and probably aren't the best person to ask questions of at the moment for that reason.
I appreciate that you are looking to contribute, however several of your recent edits seem to be unhelpful. You've been warned about this before. This is a serious encyclopedia, and goofing off won't be tolerated. Theseedits aren't acceptable, and despite being told multiple times to stop messing with your signature, you kept up with it again. You may not be aware of it, but if you do not heed the several warnings and blocks you have received, you may be placed under an editing restriction known as a topic ban, which prohibits you from editing outside of a specified area - in your case, a topic ban would likely restrict you to edit only articles, their talk pages, and your own user talk page. If this does not appear to work, then you may be blocked from all editing indefinitely. Please, to save us all a lot of time and headache, consider helping us out instead of playing around. If you're not sure what needs to be done, try taking a look at some of the links in my welcome template to get you started. You may also want to consider getting adopted by an experienced user who can help you out. You don't have to do this, but please be aware that any further unconstructive editing may result in you being recommended for a topic ban as described above. I hate to go "evil admin" on you, but you don't seem to be getting the message despite several strong attempts to get it through. Hersfoldnon-admin(t/a/c) 00:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As clearly stated at the top of my talk page, I'm on vacation, so am not available for an adoption program. You may want to see the instructions at WP:ADOPT. Hersfold(t/a/c) 23:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Please trim it. It's way too long. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 17:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, concerning this anonymous user, i was wondering whether or not he is a constant vandaliser. I am going to check, but i dislike anonymous users (my signature is satyrical for them) and i would love to block him. Thanks for your time, ((U'nknown)? (User)? oh, and please reply on my talk page. thx That is completely unacceptable. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 20:12, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Saving you the trouble. :) Though someone had already tagged it, as I came across it from CAT:CSD. :D Best, PeterSymonds(talk) 20:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please don't make edits like this. If you want to contest a speedy deletion, just remove the tag from the page (providing you're not the page's author). If you want to discuss the article, discuss it on the article's talk page, not the article itself. (Incidentally, I've declined the speedy request, as this was clearly not an attack page.) – iridescent 20:45, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
'I believe someone has stolen your account or hacked it'edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
what are you talking about please? ninety:one 21:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
kindly desist from annoying me until you have some diffs. ninety:one 22:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I have removed your entry from WP:RFA, as it was not properly completed. You will need to read the instructions step by step should you wish to re-nominate. Given your short time here though, I suggest waiting a while and gaining experience in some admin areas first. Kevin (talk) 22:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
In this edit you seem to be trying to give editors the notion you're an admin. Please don't do that, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
In this edit you now say you're not an admin, but that you have blocked 15 users. Yet, you can't have done this, since you aren't an admin. Please stop posting misleading edits about yourself, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion
Please stop now. Gwen has already warned you and you are continuing to impersonate an admin. If you continue to do this you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – iridescent 23:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I also see you mark all of your edits as minor, which is also misleading. Please don't mark edits as minor unless they are truly so, such as punctuation and typo corrections. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I havent made any edits whatsoever since you gave me the first warning. Why would you continue warning me, then block me, for edits i supposedly made after you warned me? I stopped when you said to. Please unblock, i didnt make any 'disruptive edits" after you warned me, and i feel it to be unjust for me to get block after i was already warned for something i did and was warned again, then again (why?), then finally blocked for. Please consider/unblock. Thank you, GENIUS
Decline reason:
For someone who "knows alot about Wikipedia," you seem to have no understanding of core policies and guidelines. Masking yourself as an administrator, marking all of your edits as minor, claiming that you are improving the project (but have disrupted it almost from the start), I can't see this account going anywhere. I'm denying the unblock and I'll leave it to another administrator to make a call on whether this account is one that is trustworthy and credible to keep. — seicer | talk | contribs 02:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You have lately been blocked twice for disruption. I am blocking you again for ongoing, disruptive and unhelpful edits to the project and talk spaces. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
After many warnings you made this post to ANI which showed no acknowledgement you had made misleading posts, along with asking for support there for your RFA, after already having been informed it had been removed from WP:RFA. Gwen Gale (talk) 23:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Um, actually, it did. I said i was sorry multiple times, and my RFA wasnt removed, only my misgruntled attempt at it was removed. I would reply on your userpage, but i am blocked. Please, please unblock me. Understand that i only ever want to help Wikipedia, and if posting pretend block signs ( i thought they were real, guess not) is bad for Wikipedia, then so be it. I wont ever do it again. But please unblock me:||
You're still marking all your edits as minor. Why are you doing that? Gwen Gale (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
My computer automatically does it, and whenever i click for it not to it doesnt work for some reason. Sorry, ill see if i can rearrange the scripts in my internet explorer to fix that. Anyway, will you please unblock me?
Have you gone to "My Preferences" and checked that option in the "Editing" tab? --NeilNtalk ♦ contribs 00:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Let me get this straight, please. You're using scripts but didn't know posting a block notification to a userpage doesn't block a user? Gwen Gale (talk) 00:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I won't be the one to leave you blocked/unblock you as I've been involved, but I'd say you should count yourself lucky Gwen blocked you for such a short time. Given the number of warnings on this page, and your outright lying, even after your final warning (see here for example), you're lucky she didn't come down a lot harder. – iridescent 00:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, i do use scripts (i am currently creating a movie using pure Javascript Encoding, it looks something like this (just the start, long way to go):**
@@@BUILDINFO@@@ Movie Script.jsx !Version! Fri Jun 13 2008 17:26:17 GMT-0700
{
FlashPlayer.minimumSize;8;10;10
FlashPlayer.maximumSize;8;10;10
FlashPlayer.active
FlashPlayer.loadSound; "C:\Users\Nick\Music\100;Years"
}
{
FlashPlayer.enabled
Anyway, i use scripts all the time, however, i am not fully acquainted with wikipedia's Scripts, but dont get me wrong: i do know alot about wikipedia. Thus my signature:
User:GENIUS(4th power) [coding redacted]
Aside from the above being a woefully broken script (you can't show us a movie by calling it from your hard drive, among other things), what does that have to do with building an encyclopedia? I'm starting to wonder why I didn't block you indefinitely. Gwen Gale (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I am an honors student. I have all honors classes, and am planning on going to Harvard. But know i am confused. What is your exact definition of impersonating an admin? Because i didnt impersonate, i just blocked. Impersonating an admin in my view would be: 1. Putting the admin sign on my page. 2. Saying im an admin. or 3. Enlisting as an Admin. Not helping wikipedia through blocking. That i call Patriotism. And i dont recall "impersonating an admin" for a while, when i did say i was an admin to a user. And about what Gwen said. What? You said "let me get this straight: You use scripts yet you didnt know posting a block on their userpage wouldnt block them?" I merely demonstrated my scripting ability. Oh, and obviously i wasnt trying to show you the movie. I reencoded it so that way you only get to see the words (scripts)in the file. I copied it directly from my script for the movie. I am indeed a good scripter, i didnt want to embed a movie on the Wiki or id be blocked indefinetly.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I'm sure you mean well, but you need to concentrate on article building for some time before you consider fighting vandalism. You need to have this experience in order to know the differences between constructive editing, editing tests, and vandalism. Once you fully understand all the relevant policies and guidleines, you can consider reverting the edits of others and following the polices that go with that. At any rate, there are many articles that can use expansion, the addition of sources and improved writing. I would urge you to master this aspect of the encyclopedia first of all. Hope this helps. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 00:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion
I blocked this account for 31 hours to stop your ongoing disruption. I made the block somewhat shorter than I otherwise would have because you seemed so eager to help the project. After having further looked at the background of this account I find you have made almost no contributions to the article space. This, along with your two other blocks for disruption and your behaviour on this talk page after this latest block leads me to think whatever you have been doing here has had nothing to do with building articles or helping revert vandalism. Hence I'm raising your block to indefinite. You can appeal this by using the {{unblock|your reason here}} template and discuss your block with editors who may be willing to help you understand how (and why) we do things here. However, if you meanwhile carry on tinkering with your talk page and saying things about yourself which stretch the bounds of belief until they shatter, I'll protect this page. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for ongoing disruption after almost no edits to the article space. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwen Gale (talk) 02:31, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Endorse. Enough is enough Genius. CWii(Talk|Contribs) 02:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Thank you for warning me about the whole"no edits to userspace" thing, but you must also look at the fact that i was blocked for a week previously for that matter, and from then on i started making contributory edits to the wiki. I dont understand at all why i should be indefinatly blocked, i am very concerned about the project and i am very, very unhappy with this ( my keyboard is suffering :( ) indefinate block. Please, please keep it at 31 hours. I swore an oath to only contribute to the Wiki after the week long ban, and the only reason ive edited my userpage after i was blocked was because i simply love wikipedia, and i thought it fun to edit my page in a manner of about (not exactly, dont mark it) 5 edits. Thats all, i had (and have) all intentions of helping Wikipedia. Please, i beg you, please take off the indefinite block, im begging you. Ill do anything, even if it means no wiki for a week. Please, i am only here to help Wikipedia, and i beg that you take off the indefinite block. Yours truly, GENIUS
Decline reason:
I've re-reviewed your contributions. Since you came back, you have only made eight mainspace contributions, all but one of which were disruptive and have been reverted. I won't protect this talkpage to give you a chance to give a better explanation as to why you should be unblocked, but you'll need to be more convincing than that. – iridescent 03:24, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Okay, heres the real reason why i want to be unblocked. I wish to stop vandalism. I discovered Wikipedia when i was about 10, and 2 of my pages were vandalised that i worked so hard on. Since then, i have been working hard, very hard, to understand the concepts of wikipedia ( thus all the edits to my own page). I hate Vandalism, and that is why i kept "blocking" users who i saw vandalize, because i hate it so much. Because of this vandalism hatred, i am well prepared, heh, i am willing, to serve at least 4 hours a day devoted to Anti-Vandalism on the Wiki. That is why i want to get unblocked. I want to help, and i am sorry that i screwed up. I will obviously not make that mistake again. If we were face to face, i would be on my knees. I want to destroy vandalism on Wikipedia, and i also understand that i am not an administrator. So i shall instead of taking the matters into my own hands (until im an admin...), i shall inform either you or another admin of a vandalism when i see it, behaving just like a standard user. I fully understand the reason for my punishment, and i swear yet another oath (i never break these, its true): If granted editing capabilities on wikipedia, i shall not ever again edit my talk page unless it was blanked by vandalism, then i shall re-paste it (im that paranoid, i copied it to a word document) in one edit. I shall never pretend to be an admin, nor operate as an admin under false pretences, nor perform Administrator duties. I shall be a standard user, and act accordingly until Wikipedia says otherwise. I shall follow the order of any admin, power user, or president on Wikipedia duly and respectfully, until the given order is complete, then await next order. This oath was sworn by me on June 14th, 2008 and as such shall not be broken." I cannot fully express how sorry i am, but as stated in the oath, I shall follow thy will. My life is in your hands (not really, but a big part of it), GENIUS
Decline reason:
Enough trolling. — Nakon 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
and 
. Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Lord Voldemort, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 00:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
