User talk:Fylindfotberserk/Archives/2017/May
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
May 2017
Hello, you can't add unsourced information to Wikipedia or remove sourced information. You are defying rules such as Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material and that is not how things work here on Wikipedia. (137.147.168.88 (talk) 00:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC))
- @Fylindfotberserk: Can you stop adding unsourced information? You continue to add this yet I can't find it in the source. Can you please point to it in the source? I might have overlooked it by accident. As for Haplogroup O-M175, I suggest you read the source that supports the information [1]. This source is presented later on in the article and that is where I have taken it from. You say "22", could you point to me where in the source is says "22"? (137.147.38.38 (talk) 08:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC))
@Fylindfotberserk: What is wrong with you? The Genetic Heritage of the Earliest Settlers Persists Both in Indian Tribal and Caste Populations" says nothing about the claim that you're making. Stop breaking Wikipedia rules! (120.144.167.92 (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC))
- Just letting you know that I might take this to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard to solve this issue because this is getting utterly ridiculous. (120.144.167.92 (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC))
- Apologies Fylindfotberserk, that should not have been said. I was caught in the heat of the moment, I have crossed it out. (120.144.167.92 (talk) 09:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC))
- Stop being a pest yourself and stop deleting sources in the references. You seriously have some issues with me. I've seen you're edits, you are only reverting my edits. I said it multiple times to check the References section. There are multiple Kivisild researches one of which you have deleted yourself using your multiple IPs and claim the source isn't there. I don't know why it is so hard for you to check References sections in both R1a and O pages.
R1a
That data I took is from Kivisild2003a which list 23% for Sri Lanka for a specific r1a maker that you can compare with ISOGG.com. Why it is so hard for you to click on the citation and see the PDF in the references.
O
Comorians have 22 samples for O-M50 and only one for O-MSY2.2 but not within O-M50 which brings the total to 23 samples. Again check the references.
As for the markers and stuff I'm not obliged to Spoon Feed you genetics.Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- So it takes this many messages for you to finally engage in discussion? You say, "I'm not obliged to Spoon Feed you genetics" you certainly have to when you completely ignore discussion and give poor edit summaries, so don't blame me for your behaviour. (120.144.167.92 (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC))
- @Fylindfotberserk: I just want to clarify that I don't mean to target you. I make many edits, it's just that lately most of those edits have revolved around the edit war that we have had. Anyway, it's good that we solved the problem, happy editing. (120.144.167.92 (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC))